NCAA Playoff Ranking

[mrlawler1]

Maybe you should do some looking.

There are no definite metrics.

First line on the committee website:

Ranking football teams is an art, not a science.

There's more to it than the first line of the website..
You might want to read the entire page..
Plus all the tabs and links that are there available...

[Quillback]

There's more to it than the first line of the website..
You might want to read the entire page..
Plus all the tabs and links that are there available...

Find me something definite as in any winless team gets in, or the SEC champ gets in. it's a decision by committee, there is no definite you're in criteria or metric. It's subjective. You find something that says other wise.

If there was we would not all be on here arguing.

[mrlawler1]

Find me something definite as in any winless team gets in, or the SEC champ gets in. it's a decision by committee, there is no definite you're in criteria or metric. It's subjective. You find something that says other wise.

If there was we would not all be on here arguing.

The criteria used is all there...

[Quillback]

The criteria used is all there...

You still have not come up with anything to back that up. Show me where a team got in other than by a decision of the committee. There's no criteria or metric that puts a team in automatically, bypassing the committee, into the playoffs.