Thread: Transom

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 34 of 34
  1. aka Strokedyamaha StrokerSmoker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,045
    #21
    Everyone from the factory came that way and detwiler factory set them up that way it wasn’t until plate manufacturers decided they didn’t want their plate in the middle.

    Hi performance parts or a Yamaha power head visit
    Hydro-Tec's web site @ http://www.yamaha-rebuild.com/
    Paul Hottman Hydro-Tec's Pro staff since 1998

  2. aka Strokedyamaha StrokerSmoker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,045
    #22
    putting the heavy hydro plate 10 inches further off the transom makes the weight even more further back and your angle of attack offsets and that has to be made up some where and it’s top speeds that suffer. I have driven more than most and set up is key I don’t believe that’s optimal some say foot print but either way works but one is faster.

    Hi performance parts or a Yamaha power head visit
    Hydro-Tec's web site @ http://www.yamaha-rebuild.com/
    Paul Hottman Hydro-Tec's Pro staff since 1998

  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bentonia, MS 39040
    Posts
    3,356
    #23
    Well Kevin had redone all, except pumps, clean up wiring etc. Now I have all new pumps, new valves, new cables, cleaned up wiring. Took out old slide control, cut piece of carbon fiber, water jet, offset the new style valve controls.
    Ron Fears
    Stroker/300XS
    1E003823

  4. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bentonia, MS 39040
    Posts
    3,356
    #24
    All that chris had done lately were behind static plate. David's with 300r went 110 with trolling motor
    Ron Fears
    Stroker/300XS
    1E003823

  5. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bentonia, MS 39040
    Posts
    3,356
    #25
    Did same to another David has that Chris has redone, 300x. Now Chris didn't get a chance to run that one. It is a hotrod 300x with all trick billet parts, side steer etc.
    Ron Fears
    Stroker/300XS
    1E003823

  6. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bentonia, MS 39040
    Posts
    3,356
    #26
    Plus I can tell ya on mine, the old plate had a ton of slack in guides, apparently bushings are shot. Mechanically putting Jack plate on boat is far in excess of operating pressures I would say as leverage on unit is increased exponentially by doing so with the needed setback
    Ron Fears
    Stroker/300XS
    1E003823

  7. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bentonia, MS 39040
    Posts
    3,356
    #27
    Plus is used the extreme static plate also
    Ron Fears
    Stroker/300XS
    1E003823

  8. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bentonia, MS 39040
    Posts
    3,356
    #28
    And boxed it in
    Ron Fears
    Stroker/300XS
    1E003823

  9. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Newberg, OR
    Posts
    652
    #29
    Good sharing of ideas. Food for thought on both setups.

    I guess for me, if is ain't broken after 23 year, don't change it is the plan. That statement it not quite true as I have kind of changed it. From the factory, I had an 8" Detwiler with a 6" setback plate. That was changed to a modification to the Detwiler to make it a 6" and then added the Leverage setback to where I could adjust the total setback from 14" to 18". A few years later, I removed the Leverage and replaced it with a 10" Hydro Dynamics setback plate.

    Like many, I have changed a lot on the boat over the 23 year. Still love the boat and will continue to enjoy it for hopefully many more years.
    fastglass1
    2000 Stroker
    2005 250XS
    30+ Performer 3 and 30 Performer 4

  10. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bentonia, MS 39040
    Posts
    3,356
    #30
    Yup me also. Waiting for clean water and then gonna see what happens with mine. Guy that went with me other day, 55 was limit
    Ron Fears
    Stroker/300XS
    1E003823

  11. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bentonia, MS 39040
    Posts
    3,356
    #31
    After blueprinting hull, should buzz right along
    Ron Fears
    Stroker/300XS
    1E003823

  12. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bentonia, MS 39040
    Posts
    3,356
    #32
    I also used a hydrodynamics 10 inch setback and 6 inch seastar extreme. That sucker is way faster than old one. But I had to completely disassemble static plate. Side plates were past angle and kinda wonky. I talked to them about it and decided to just fix myself. I have access to a cnc, water jet and laser. All worked great.
    Ron Fears
    Stroker/300XS
    1E003823

  13. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    934
    #33
    Quote Originally Posted by StrokerSmoker View Post
    putting the heavy hydro plate 10 inches further off the transom makes the weight even more further back and your angle of attack offsets and that has to be made up some where and it’s top speeds that suffer. I have driven more than most and set up is key I don’t believe that’s optimal some say foot print but either way works but one is faster.
    hmm, I would take Paul’s knowledge over anyone’s when it comes to strokers and setting them up.

  14. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bentonia, MS 39040
    Posts
    3,356
    #34
    Quote Originally Posted by BASStex1988 View Post
    hmm, I would take Paul’s knowledge over anyone’s when it comes to strokers and setting them up.
    Only differance is location of plate, I have all ionic batteries, zero backwash now, so seems to be better actually
    Ron Fears
    Stroker/300XS
    1E003823

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12