Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 31
  1. #1
    Member lablazin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Robertsdale,AL
    Posts
    1,990

    Question Merc 115 or 150 gas mileage

    Looking to get a new boat in the next 2-3 months. Looking at either Vexus AVX1880 or 1980, Or a Ranger RT188P or 198P. How does the Mercury ProXS 115 or 150 do on gas mileage? Kinda wanting to go with a 150, but if the difference between in mileage is huge between the 115 and 150 I may go towards the 115.

  2. Member Bill Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    The Diamond State
    Posts
    3,988
    #2
    I can’t help with the 150 but I consistently get 5.0 MPG on my 115 on RT188. my fishing style is short runs and I don’t troll. I normally drive about 4800-5000 RPM.

    I try to drive as if my 16 year old Grandson is following me
    Speak as if he is listening and act as if he is watching

  3. Member Extremeboating's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Location
    Concord, CA
    Posts
    505
    #3
    4.9-5.0 mpg at wide open throttle on the 115's.
    - 2020 Bass Tracker Classic XL - SOLD
    - 2024 Lowe Stinger 178
    Mercury 115HP ProXS CT
    Vance 6" hydraulic jack plate
    24P 3 blade Ballistic XHS XL propeller
    NGK Ruthenium plugs
    Garmin Force troller
    Garmin 126SV/93SV/73SV Livescope/ dual GT54 transducers
    DD26 motor toter
    IG: extremeboating



  4. Member Mechanic Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Wilmington, NC
    Posts
    2,552
    #4
    Not sure on the fuel capacity on the AVX, but my 2019 RT198 P has a huge fuel tank and the 150XS is stingy on fuel. Don't know the MPG but I have made some very long runs in a given day, and never have fuel concerns.
    2019 RT 198P
    2018 Mercury Pro XS 150 HP 4 Stroke #2B610068
    Twin 12' BT Talons
    4" Atlas Jack Plate
    Riptide Instinct Quest

  5. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Pelham, AL
    Posts
    2,176
    #5
    I have a 115 Optimax and the gas mileage is ridiculous. Typically burn 4-5 gallons for a full day. The four stroke, 4 cylinder 115 is also great on gas. Thing to consider is what boat do you want and the motor will follow.
    2015 Ranger RT188 DC; BassCat Storage Box; Mercury Optimax 115ProXS;
    19" Spitfire X7; Vessel View Mobile; Minn Kota Ultrex 80; GForce Handle;
    TM Eliminator; Helix 7 G2N SI Combo F/R; HydroWave KVD; BBT 4" Angled Bow Mount; Durasafe Locks for Electronics and Ultrex;
    Twist Step Boarding Ladder; EZEE Step ES1; BAC RAC Rod Storage; Motor Mate Transom Saver

  6. Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    South Point OH
    Posts
    6,053
    #6
    A 150 uses more fuel than a 115 running wide open, however a 150 running at part throttle will use less fuel than a 115 will running wide open at that same speed.

  7. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    240
    #7
    Per my VesselView, my 2022 RT 188P gets the following:
    7.3 mpg at 3000rpms, 6.1 mpg at 4000, 5.4 at 5000 and 4.5 at 6000. That is based on 63.43 hours on the 115xs/ct.

  8. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    Drums PA
    Posts
    738
    #8
    I know budget factors, but i wouldn't let gas mileage determine which boat to buy. Get the boat that gets you as close as you can to want you want for size and extras. Maybe an 1880 with more goodies is more important to a lightly tricked out 1980? Maybe an extra foot matters for ride and fishing function so you go with the 198P?
    Both engines will do great on fuel.
    2020 Vexus AVX 1880
    Evinrude E-Tec 135 HO
    Ultrex
    Lowrance

  9. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Clarksville TN
    Posts
    32,767
    #9
    Quote Originally Posted by zaprod71 View Post
    I know budget factors, but i wouldn't let gas mileage determine which boat to buy. Get the boat that gets you as close as you can to want you want for size and extras. Maybe an 1880 with more goodies is more important to a lightly tricked out 1980? Maybe an extra foot matters for ride and fishing function so you go with the 198P?
    Both engines will do great on fuel.
    Agreed, while my little 115 4S sips fuel compared to my last 225, that fuel is a drop in the bucket compared to the overall cost of bass fishing.

  10. Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    South Point OH
    Posts
    6,053
    #10
    I would get a boat with a Yamaha SHO on it instead of a Mercury, better performance all around.

  11. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    14,936
    #11
    Fule consumption wouldn't even be a consideration when buying a boat unless it was an offshore boat with a 500 gallon gas tank.

  12. Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Newmarket, ON
    Posts
    5,402
    #12
    Quote Originally Posted by zaprod71 View Post
    I know budget factors, but i wouldn't let gas mileage determine which boat to buy. Get the boat that gets you as close as you can to want you want for size and extras. Maybe an 1880 with more goodies is more important to a lightly tricked out 1980? Maybe an extra foot matters for ride and fishing function so you go with the 198P?
    Both engines will do great on fuel.
    Agree also. But bigger is usually better. More storage, space, and better in the rough stuff. Extras can be added later, but boat length can’t. Throttling back on the bigger boat with a 150 will likely get you the same fuel economy as running the 115 flat out on the smaller boat, and likely around the same speed.
    2019 BCB Classic
    Merc V8 200 4S

  13. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Matthews, NC
    Posts
    1,012
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by catdude28 View Post
    Agree also. But bigger is usually better. More storage, space, and better in the rough stuff. Extras can be added later, but boat length can’t. Throttling back on the bigger boat with a 150 will likely get you the same fuel economy as running the 115 flat out on the smaller boat, and likely around the same speed.
    ... and that strategy will put less wear on the motor as well. Better to run a 150hp at 4500-5000rpm as opposed to a 115hp at 6300rpm.

  14. Member Extremeboating's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Location
    Concord, CA
    Posts
    505
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnnyred View Post
    ... and that strategy will put less wear on the motor as well. Better to run a 150hp at 4500-5000rpm as opposed to a 115hp at 6300rpm.
    They're little 4 bangers not V6's or V8's. They LOVE to rev.
    - 2020 Bass Tracker Classic XL - SOLD
    - 2024 Lowe Stinger 178
    Mercury 115HP ProXS CT
    Vance 6" hydraulic jack plate
    24P 3 blade Ballistic XHS XL propeller
    NGK Ruthenium plugs
    Garmin Force troller
    Garmin 126SV/93SV/73SV Livescope/ dual GT54 transducers
    DD26 motor toter
    IG: extremeboating



  15. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Ooltewah, TN
    Posts
    550
    #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Extremeboating View Post
    They're little 4 bangers not V6's or V8's. They LOVE to rev.
    I'm really not trying to start a fight but I see this comment all the time and have a hard time with the logic of it. Yes smaller engines rev to higher rpms than bigger engines, it's just physics. It seems to me that common sense would say that any device when run at the top of its allowed range will see a decreased life compared to running at a less stressful rate of operation. I would agree that the smaller engines have internals that weigh less so they may last longer at WOT than a bigger heavier engine but I maintain that a smaller engine will live longer if it is usually operated in the sweet spot of its cruise rpm range compared to the same engine operated mostlly at WOT. Just less wear and tear on the engine. My opinion concerning the OP's question is, there won't be much difference (total $$$ spent for fuel in a years time) between the 150 and the 115 but the 150 will push the boat at normal speeds easier the 115 and have a higher top speed and cruise speed for when you need it. I'd get the 150 if the extra $$ are there for the purchase. Resell will be better, performance will be better and as stated your fuel cost won't be much different.

  16. Member lablazin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Robertsdale,AL
    Posts
    1,990
    #16
    Thanks for the advice guys. Just having a hard time deciding. I would love a bigger boat with the 150. Just some things i'm thinking about. Down here in the delta with tidal water sometimes you have have to go through some areas with less than a foot of water, so thinking about the weight of the bigger boat getting in there. Sometimes during the summer you have to make some long runs to get to a area with moving water when the water temps get hot. And also towing weight.

  17. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Matthews, NC
    Posts
    1,012
    #17
    Quote Originally Posted by ChooChooSnakeMan View Post
    I'm really not trying to start a fight but I see this comment all the time and have a hard time with the logic of it. Yes smaller engines rev to higher rpms than bigger engines, it's just physics. It seems to me that common sense would say that any device when run at the top of its allowed range will see a decreased life compared to running at a less stressful rate of operation. I would agree that the smaller engines have internals that weigh less so they may last longer at WOT than a bigger heavier engine but I maintain that a smaller engine will live longer if it is usually operated in the sweet spot of its cruise rpm range compared to the same engine operated mostlly at WOT. Just less wear and tear on the engine. My opinion concerning the OP's question is, there won't be much difference (total $$$ spent for fuel in a years time) between the 150 and the 115 but the 150 will push the boat at normal speeds easier the 115 and have a higher top speed and cruise speed for when you need it. I'd get the 150 if the extra $$ are there for the purchase. Resell will be better, performance will be better and as stated your fuel cost won't be much different.
    You read my mind! Could not have said it better.

  18. Member Mechanic Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Wilmington, NC
    Posts
    2,552
    #18
    Quote Originally Posted by lablazin View Post
    Thanks for the advice guys. Just having a hard time deciding. I would love a bigger boat with the 150. Just some things i'm thinking about. Down here in the delta with tidal water sometimes you have have to go through some areas with less than a foot of water, so thinking about the weight of the bigger boat getting in there. Sometimes during the summer you have to make some long runs to get to a area with moving water when the water temps get hot. And also towing weight.
    I too run some skinny water with my rig. Only problems are getting up or coming off plane, but that is Skinny water fishing!
    2019 RT 198P
    2018 Mercury Pro XS 150 HP 4 Stroke #2B610068
    Twin 12' BT Talons
    4" Atlas Jack Plate
    Riptide Instinct Quest

  19. Member lablazin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Robertsdale,AL
    Posts
    1,990
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Mechanic Bob View Post
    I too run some skinny water with my rig. Only problems are getting up or coming off plane, but that is Skinny water fishing!

    Bob how shallow will that boat float?

  20. Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Clarksville TN
    Posts
    32,767
    #20
    I had my RT188 115 ProXs 4S out yesterday. My Smart Craft read 10.5 GPH burn rate at WOT (5900 RPMs) and 48 MPH GPS, livewell full and 1/4 tank of gas with full load. Typically an outboard will burn about the first two numbers of HP at WOT per hour. IE, count on a 150 burning about 15 GPH, a 200 burning about 20 GPH etc... Obviously hulls make a difference but it's a good guide to burn rate.

    I agree with max HP but I have ran a couple with less. My Cat Cougar had a 225 Opti and my Sabre originally had a 150. The Sabre really woke up with the extra 25HP when I swapped for a 175. Let's be real, most of us don't run WOT everywhere. Most boats that came in when I worked at a dealership only had maybe 10% of total hours at WOT.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast