(Have you sent the injectors yet?)
I think the perfectionist way of a rebuild is surely the best way to do it and if I should repair an engine for someone else taking money for it I'd like for sure to have a happy customer with an engine that runs flawlessly for some years in the future. Also economically that would be the right way for a shop as the customer returning within the warranty period would be expensive, the customer reporting after 3 or 4 years reporting bad work kept potential customers from coming to my shop while the customer reporting "it wasn't cheap but it was worth it" is a good recommendation.
And a customer that once wanted it the cheap way would forget more rapidly that he agreed to a compromise (knowing about the risks) than that he had his engine rebuilt.
But when thinking about doing it myself? With this engine beeing mine I'd be really tempted to do it the cheap way. 146 hours, good compression on two cylinders- why not get the 3rd cylinder bored and honed, get an oversized piston and try? Displacement is almost the same (+ 0.015" is +0.83%, + 0.030" is +1.66%), that would be a difference in compression of ~1 or ~2 psi given the 120psi (?) of the two others. Piston weight is according to manual almost the same, too.
I think this also is an area where there might be some myths out how things have to be done. But of course no one checks if one could set the limit a little lower as good craftsmanship recommends- either it's your reputation (shop side) or your money/ work (owners side).
I may be spoiled by my own area of work where I've seen too many discarded fundamental truths in the last years... so my excuses for this nasty post