
Originally Posted by
Drakestar
I'm just going off the actual comparison video that you posted above, not the specs alone:
Watching the fish in the middle appear at 4:26 (shows on ML2 first).
Watching both dock pilings still display on ML2 at 4:40 while LVS only shows one. (Could be occlusion, but ML2 also shows one remaining piling when they've already disappeared on LVS34).
Watching another fish in the middle appear on ML2 first at 4:41, and then disappear later than LVS at 4:46.
Watching pilings appear & disappear at 4:48 and 4:51.
It's not the world and I don't mean to nitpick or manufacture support for ML2, but IMO it's there regardless of what the actual specs say. Two thoughts:
* I was considering that maybe both transducers are not aimed in precisely the same direction (so that objects would appear first on one screen, but then also disappear first on that one). But I don't think that's the case.
* It could be different contrast settings, of course, but to my eye, the ML2 picture is only a running bit hotter than LVS: those two visible pilings vs one visible piling at 4:48 don't feel contrast-dependent.
Happy to have people argue the other way, though! And conversely, if we want to argue that LVS has better target separation there are several examples: e.g. the middle fish near the bottom at 4:41 (ML2 looks blurrier, and thus the detachment from the bottom isn't as clear as on LVS34).