Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    ST. Albans
    Posts
    27

    E tec HO compared to E tec

    What is the difference between an E tec HO versus a regular E tec? Sorry to sound like a dumb question, but I am going to buy a 150 E tec so just curious as to the difference (s) My dealer saiys it is $700 more in price, so what would you get in this price upgrade? Thanks for any input.
    rogbu

  2. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Trussville
    Posts
    1,825
    #2

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (rogbu)

    Different lower unit, and graphics on the motor. The HO is " factory tuned for high performance" which tells me nothing. However I would surmise the engine puts out about 165 hp instead of just 150.

    Most people report the HO to be a very strong motor. I wish I could afford one, I would love to upgrade.


    _________________________________________
    96 Javelin 379SE 96 Johnson 150 (J150ELEDB)
    Mods: FS carbs, Ficht reed cages, boyesen reeds and
    Baker Hot Heads.

  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    ST. Albans
    Posts
    27
    #3

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (Lockjaw)

    Thanks Lockjaw. I am going to the dealership tomorrow to sit down and work up a deal on an Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS with this 150 Etec on it. I am not sure if it is worth it to spend $700 more to go with the HO model or not. I bet this would be a smokin fast ride though. Thanks for the input.
    rogbu

  4. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    1,411
    #4

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (rogbu)

    <TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rogbu &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I am not sure if it is worth it to spend $700 more to go with the HO model or not.</TD></TR></TABLE>

    I would definently get the HO if its only $700 more... it will fly

  5. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    ST. Albans
    Posts
    27
    #5

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (Rmart30)

    Thanks for the info guys. I just ordered my boat at the dealer today and I went with the E tec 150 HO on an Alumacraft Navigator 175 CS. Dealer said Alumacraft tested this set up and it ran Speedometer at 67 MPH !!! This boat will be Scary Fast !!!!!!!!! NEED for SPEED LOL!!!
    Thanks,
    rogbu

  6. Moderator SEAHORSE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    9,638
    #6

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (rogbu)

    <TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rogbu &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Dealer said Alumacraft tested this set up and it ran Speedometer at 67 MPH !!!</TD></TR></TABLE>

    I think the speed is a bit optimistic but you will have a great performing rig anyway. Most boats lose about 5-10 mph when they leave the dealership.
    -----


    A Technical troubleshooter possessing more tools than talent !

  7. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    ST. Albans
    Posts
    27
    #7

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (SEAHORSE)

    Seahorse,
    I hear ya on losing 5 to 10 mph. Although we think we get a good deal on Cars, boats etc when we buy, we all get hosed in the endLOL!!!!!
    Thanks man.
    Rogbu


    Modified by rogbu at 8:51 AM 2/3/2008

  8. Sprint Boats Moderator Bassmeister's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Calhoun, Ga.
    Posts
    47,086
    #8

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (rogbu)

    I think you will like that combo!!

  9. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Trussville
    Posts
    1,825
    #9

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (Bassmeister)

    I would love that engine or a 150 Promax, my boat is HP limited at 150.


    _________________________________________
    96 Javelin 379SE 96 Johnson 150 (J150ELEDB)
    Mods: FS carbs, Ficht reed cages, boyesen reeds and
    Baker Hot Heads.

  10. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    columbia
    Posts
    399
    #10

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (Lockjaw)

    E-TEC

  11. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Drammen
    Posts
    261
    #11

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (Lockjaw)

    <TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Lockjaw &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Different lower unit, and graphics on the motor. The HO is " factory tuned for high performance" which tells me nothing. However I would surmise the engine puts out about 165 hp instead of just 150.

    Most people report the HO to be a very strong motor. I wish I could afford one, I would love to upgrade. </TD></TR></TABLE>

    I think you get a better prop as well, a Raker II is standard on the HO.
    I have been told the 150 HO puts out 167-168 hp on the prop-shaft.

  12. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Yulee
    Posts
    1,536
    #12

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (torew)

    I went from 52mph to 60mph when I upgraded from the 1998 Johnson 150 to a 2007 150HO ETEC. Through the increase in MPH was great I actually like the fuel economy increase much more. The MPH increase was verified with the 2 GPS's unit I have onboard and one handheld.

  13. Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Trussville
    Posts
    1,825
    #13

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (Subman)

    What kind of boat?

    As much as I give BRP static on some of their advertising and all that, I do like their Ho150 Etec. It would likely be my choice if I were going to repower.

    I would love to see a comparison of the three DFI 150's on a fairly decent hull, one that would get into the mid 60's so we could see how they run.



    _________________________________________
    96 Javelin 379SE 96 Johnson 150 (J150ELEDB)
    Mods: FS carbs, Ficht reed cages, boyesen reeds and
    Baker Hot Heads.

  14. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Yulee
    Posts
    1,536
    #14

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (Lockjaw)

    Before the new ETEC. 1998 SeaArk ZX200DC,


  15. Member DoferGofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Edgewood Maryland
    Posts
    1,807
    #15

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (Lockjaw)

    <TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Lockjaw &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What kind of boat?
    I do like their Ho150 Etec. It would likely be my choice if I were going to repower.

    I would love to see a comparison of the three DFI 150's on a fairly decent hull, one that would get into the mid 60's so we could see how they run.

    </TD></TR></TABLE>
    I am with you Lockjaw, I would hate to get rid of my old cross-flow, buy a new HO 150 Etec and not be any faster than my old 1985 XP 150.



    Regards,

    If you can't run with the big dogs, just stay on the porch.

    Model E150DPLIIB, Serial 05311818, Mfg Date 02/2011

    SST... 14 1/2" x 19" 45.0 mph.@4950
    Rebel 15 1/2" x 17" 45.1 mph.@5250
    Rebel 15 1/2" x 16" 44.6 mph.@5300 (Re-pitched/Balanced/Blue Printed by Mark's Props)
    Rebel 15 3/4" x 15" 44.2 mph.@5700-5750

  16. Member 61Woody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Waterloo,IA.
    Posts
    3,928
    #16

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (rogbu)

    Sorry to bust your buble rogbu but the dealer sold you a bill of goods. Should have saved the 700 ?? cause a 1200+ lb V bottom is not going to break 60 with a 150 even if it is a HO. Go to Alalumacrafts website and check out a 175 sport(same hull) with a regular E-tec 150 on it. A little over 51 mph. I'd ask the dealer for a little refund, sorry if that sounds harsh but I had a similar thing happen to me when I bought my Crestliner(smaller but same hull design) dealer said it would run mid 30's with a 50 hp. it would only run 28 so I ended up getting a good deal on a 75.
    http://alumacraft.com/images/s...0.pdf
    21 Lund 1775 Impact XS 21 Merc 115 Pro XS

  17. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    ST. Albans
    Posts
    27
    #17

    Re: E tec HO compared to E tec (Hawkeye)

    Thanks Hawkeye, I have to agree with you. I saw the reviews from Alumacraft well before I bought the boat. Any salesman that works on a percentage to pay the bills will "Fluff" things up to secure the sale. I really liked the white motor and the standard Stars n Stripes decal that come on the HO motor and the BEST PART OF ALL, my wife told me that she would pay the extra to upgrade so she wouldn't have to listen to me later saying "I wish I would have gotten the HO version." That was fine with me. LOL Also, it made it easier to seal the deal that the particular dealer I went with came in a $3000 less with the HO version included as opposed to two other dealers that were pricing just the regular 150 E TEC with the package. I will still enjoy the boat. I don't make long runs so if I can get 50 ish out of it going from spot to spot I will be happy. I am a Musky fisherman so peed is not critical to me. I would rather keep my lure in their face than boat ride .I'll let you guys know how fast the rig will run when I get on the water. Also, for down the road when the boat has seen her better days, it should help in selling it with having the MAX HP + allowed on the boat. Thanks for the input.
    Rogbu


    Modified by rogbu at 7:56 PM 2/6/2008

Similar Threads

  1. Z100"s compared to Z500's
    By teamcobra2 in forum Ranger Boats
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-17-2012, 11:12 AM
  2. Compared to champion
    By basscaster46 in forum Charger Boats
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 03-27-2010, 10:56 PM
  3. 250 XB compared to 250 XS
    By canadabullet in forum Mercury - 3 Liter & 3 Liter High Performance
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-06-2009, 05:40 PM
  4. Amsoil compared to XD-100
    By fastman151 in forum Evinrude/Johnson Motors
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-16-2008, 03:00 PM
  5. TR-21 compared to 201
    By Stratos Luver in forum Stratos/Javelin Boats
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-07-2007, 01:17 AM