Thread: 97 209 Prop?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Jacksonville
    Posts
    711

    97 209 Prop?

    Im looking to buy a prop for top end speed. Im currently runnning a 28p Raker. The prop is dinged up quite a bit but I can still run 72mph @5800-6000rpms. Im looking to get a prop for speed and playing around. What are you guys recommend/what are some of you running? hat can I expect for speed out of this thing? Thanks, Kyle

  2. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    League City
    Posts
    249
    #2

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (YoungBassin)

    If you're turning a 28p prop on a gambler at 5800-6000. I've gotta couple of questions for ya'....

    1.) is the prop missing a blade or two?
    2.) what tha' heck kinna motta do you have on that thing? More so... what lower unit/gear ratio?

    You supply that information and you'll get the information you're looking for.

  3. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Jacksonville
    Posts
    711
    #3

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (Dougw1515)

    1999 Evinrude 225
    Lower Unit 1.82 gears I believe (whatever stock is)

    Turning a 3 blade Raker 28p at 5800-6000rpms

    Im just looking for more topend out of it.

    I went on mercurys website and put in all the info, boat weight/motor/gear etc etc and it said i should run a 29p Temptest. Only thing is I dont wanna buy a merc prop and have it re-hubbed. I mean if thats the ticket then fine Ill do it but theres gotta be a evinrude/johnson prop out there that'll work decent.


  4. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    League City
    Posts
    249
    #4

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (YoungBassin)

    You can purchase a hub kit for it if you get a merc. prop. no problem there. They're not pressed in and they have kits for OMC and Yammies... among others.

    But something ain't right - IMHO... I've got a 2009 225 Pro XS on a '95 209 and while set up isn't completed it's running 80 mph @ 5600 turning a 27p trophy.

    On Mercs. prop selector guide what information did you put in? Namely what hull weight did you enter? No way you'll turn a 29p Tempest with a stock OMC 225 - even if it's HO anything.

    I'm not big on OMC's but for the most part I recall their recommended rpm's being closer to a max. 5600.

    Here's what I'd do if I were you.... start off bolting a 26p trophy on it, play with the engine height and see what you get. That prop you have now has to be wacked pretty good to let you turn those numbers.

  5. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Jacksonville
    Posts
    711
    #5

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (Dougw1515)

    I put in

    1250 hull dry weight
    505 engine weight
    250 me+gear
    1999 Evinrude 225

    And I got 29p temptest?

    I have a hub kit, not sure if it will go in a merc prop but its the "flo torque" design.

    I have the book on the motor not 100%+ but believe my redline is 6600.RPMS, I will double check.

    Thanks For help....


  6. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Westblocton
    Posts
    2,406
    #6

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (YoungBassin)

    My 97 209 is in the 1650 to 1700# range. If you have a 1250# hull in a 2100 gambler she should haul a$$.

  7. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    League City
    Posts
    249
    #7

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (CRIMSONGAMBLER)

    Yeah I want me one of them thair 1250# 209 hulls too! 1650# is the correct entry.

    If you have a 1999 Fitch the rpm range, according to one web site, is 5-6000rpms.

    I'll be realllll suprised if you can turn that 29p Tempest much above 5000rpms. Let me know what your hole shot is like.

    If you're talking about the hub kit that came with the prop.... that fits a mercury engine - exchange it for a OMC kit.

    Good luck n' let us know the outcome!

  8. BBC PREZ Al from Canada's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Bobcaygeon, ON
    Posts
    75,225
    #8

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (Dougw1515)

    [QUOTE=Dougw1515]If you're turning a 28p prop on a gambler at 5800-6000. I've gotta couple of questions for ya'....

    QUOTE]

    Not quite sure why turning a 28 on a Gambler would be so unusual; I turn a 28 Bravo to 6200 on my 2100.....now I do have a 250 but I'm sure there are plenty of guys turning 28's with 225's.

  9. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    League City
    Posts
    249
    #9

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (Al from Canada)

    Al.... he's in a '97 209 w/1999 225 fitch. Oh... never mind you seem, for some reason, determined to contradict things I say. Your board... your choice. Funny thing though where the heck are your helpful hints for folks looking for answers? Only time I seem to see you is when.... well you get the picture. Why don't you offer up suggestions for the guy?

    So you're turning a 28p bravo @ 6200.... Add an inch for cupping and you have a theroretical speed of 97mph. How close are you getting to that? Knock off the added 1" pitch and your theroretical speeds drops to 94mph. How close you getting to that? What kinna lower unit do you have on that 250? Have a hydraulic jackplate? You throw out rpm and prop pitch without GPS numbers - meaningless.


    Modified by Dougw1515 at 7:47 PM 8/18/2009

  10. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Beauregard, Alabama
    Posts
    4,339
    #10

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (YoungBassin)

    You might want to do a trial with a 27 pitch Renegade Bass. With an OMC engine you could use the older rubber (pressed) hub or the newer TBX (removeable) hub. On my GT183 the Renegade Bass has very good lift and great hole shot. The Renegade should be a sturdier prop than a newer Raker prop. Good luck.

  11. Member ldbass55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Jacksonville Beach, Florida
    Posts
    5,099
    #11

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (Dougw1515)

    ok..i am going to put this out there, so maybe you can lighten up just a little with the feedback....i learned a long time ago not to doubt anything if you haven't seen it yourself...i know some boys with some badazz 225 cowlings on their motors...but the truth is that something isnt right with that setup...a 225 stock ho, aint going to spin a 28 raker, or for sure a 29 tempest...and the hull weight is 1650 to 1700...
    that prop has been depitched, or the tach is wrong...and i just replaced mine, because it was reading 8000 at wot.... a 25 or 26 inch prop should be the right pitch for that rig...on the very outside..a 27...a raker is a good prop for that rig though...you just need to have it checked and worked, or look for a good new one...as far as all this putting your numbers into a chart and figuring your boat speed, thats great for ballpark figures...too many variables..a 28 bravo doesnt run or turn like a 28 of any other make prop...and my caculator with als numbers and a 10 percent slip gives me around 84 to 85..i guess what i am trying to say is i agree with you on the 225, but there is no need to get bent because anyone including al doesnt agree with your wisdom...sometimes its the mature thing to give the best advice you can, and feel good about it...there will ALWAYS be some that will see it different...maybe this young man has a nitrous bottle....who knows...its all good...
    LD

  12. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    League City
    Posts
    249
    #12

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (ldbass55)

    LD.... the reason I got my panties in a wad is Al has had a habit of making comments like the one he made here to things I've posted. And then I question him on it and there's no response. It's getting old.

    We figure the same.... I figure Al has a 83-84mph boat. 85-86 and maaaaaybe 87 is about all you're gonna wring from a Gambler with a stock 225/250. Just a fact of life. Most are gonna run in the 81-83mph range with a good set up. A whole slew of'em are gonna see 78-79 on a daily basis.

    As for the original post... Stock gearing on that engine is 1.86 vs 1.75 for the Pro XS soooo he could probably turn a tad larger prop but I wouldn't think, even with that gear ratio, he'd spin a 29p Tempest very high.

  13. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Jacksonville
    Posts
    711
    #13

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (ldbass55)

    OK sooooo Im wrong. All i can post is what Im seeing in the boat. Maybe the tach IS wrong. Maybe the prop has been de-pitched. I dont know....I just want to get the F N boat running at full potential. I got it last November and I got what I got. When I first started running it it handled like chit. Then I added some more setback to it. Im now at 13" setback which I think is a little too much but I dont have the money to buy a 12 or 10". So its either 13" and it handles good or 6" and runs like chit.

    I posted this to try and find out what i SHOULD be running and what EVERYONE ELSE is running. Not to be told the #'s dont add up. I KNOW THE NUMBERS DONT ADD UP or I wouldnt have posted looking for HELP!.

    -- I dont have nitrous.



  14. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    League City
    Posts
    249
    #14

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (YoungBassin)

    YB - you should be OK with the 13" plate. What mounting hole is the engine bolted to the plate? I've got no experience with OMC's but... with 3.0L Mercs. if you had the stock gear case you needed to stuff'em down in the water to get'em to work. With the torque master you need to run'em much higher.

    My boat is in Florida getting "healed" and set up with the '09 225 Pro XS isn't complete. The XS is a torque monster but with summer heat the last time out I was spinning a 27" Trophy 54-5600 maxing out at 80.02gps. My first Gambler was a '96 209TE with 225 2.5 ProMax. That combo spun a 26" Trophy at the limiter of 6750rpm and was good for 80-83mph depending on water/temp. conditions. Early in this thread I recommended you try a 26" Trophy. I did that not thinking of your OMC engine. Sooo.... if you wanna bolt on a Renegade that'd probably work too. The Tempest/raker will be 1-2mph quicker(maybe) but the boat handles and turns better with the 4 blades. The bravo prop Al mentioned is a really good prop for a Gambler if speed is not your main consern. The bravo will be 1-3 mph. slower than a Trophy/Tempest or Renegade/Raker.

  15. Member ldbass55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Jacksonville Beach, Florida
    Posts
    5,099
    #15

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (YoungBassin)

    you are good with the 13 inch setback...and if i can be of any help to you i will meet up with you when i get a day off...i got a couple of props that might tell you which way you need to go...i would also look at sending the raker to mark croxton and have him clean it up and dial it in for you...he can tell you the true pitch of the prop when he gets it...you just need to start finding some new wheels to put on the motor to try..my first choice would be a raker, followed by a croxtonized tempest...
    LD

  16. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Jacksonville
    Posts
    711
    #16

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (ldbass55)

    Thanks everyone.

    LD I'll be hooking up with you sometime I'm sure. My prop (i believe) is un repairable. I will post pics Friday.

    Im looking for SPEED out of whatever prop I purchase. The 28 raker Im running now Im content with for tourneys and regular fishing. But when its summertime and Im up in SC on Lake Marion running a cigar boat with the ladies on it I wanna smoke em.


  17. Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Scranton
    Posts
    266
    #17

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (YoungBassin)

    my set up is close to yours i am running an 97 intimidator with a 225 3L EFI Merc in arkansas spring fall and winter turn a 27 tempest 79.2 GPS at 59 to 6K summer i am running a 26 fury at 77.2GPS and can over rev it set where the tempest runs but the hole shot on the 27 is horrible when the weather is hot.

  18. Member ldbass55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Jacksonville Beach, Florida
    Posts
    5,099
    #18

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (YoungBassin)

    man...if its still got the blades on it mark can fix it....
    and i am heading to marion myself in mid october...
    LD

  19. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Jacksonville
    Posts
    711
    #19

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (ldbass55)

    LD - Let me know when you head to Marion. My dad lives 1 blk away from Harrys Fish Camp on the Diversion canal. Depending on where your headed Maybe we can catch up around there. Ill be staying at his house whenever I go up there. My b-day is Oct 10th and Im trying to get up there the weekend of or following.

    Ill post a picture of my current prop and you all can take a look at what I got. Im sure it can probably be fixed but my thing is.... Fix it for X amount of $$ or buy another one....

    Does anyone think Ill see 85 out of the rig or no? 80 would be about tops.

    Good to know Im ok with the setback. I sure do have a hellacious holeshot, Even without trim tabs.


  20. Member ldbass55's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Jacksonville Beach, Florida
    Posts
    5,099
    #20

    Re: 97 209 Prop? (YoungBassin)

    no...you wont see 85..unless you bolt on a 300...
    i know a couple that are running 77 to 78...may hit 80 on a cool winter morning with a light load...but thats still haulin it with a 225...i think i get to marion on the 14th or 15th....maybe i will see you there if not before...
    LD

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Propco prop for eninrude for sale on prop forum
    By JegsCat in forum Evinrude/Johnson Motors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-13-2011, 10:49 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-25-2010, 04:58 AM
  3. Shooter prop vs Renegade prop
    By champ186dc in forum Evinrude/Johnson Motors
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-13-2010, 06:18 PM
  4. 2005 Mercury 200HP Optimax , New Fury Prop what is the correct Prop Nut Torque
    By GeorgeSantaRosa in forum Mercury - 3 Liter & 3 Liter High Performance
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-12-2009, 04:01 PM
  5. 1999 200 HP evinrude with stainless steel prop or aluminum prop
    By pvhtc in forum Evinrude/Johnson Motors
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-05-2005, 11:51 AM