Re: Right to privacy? (Alan S)
What are those people hiding that they didn't want to be on TV for 30 seconds to receive $14mil ??
Re: Right to privacy? (RoadrashPaul)
<table width="90%" cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 align=center><tr><td>Quote, originally posted by RoadrashPaul »</td></tr><tr><td class="quote">What are those people hiding that they didn't want to be on TV for 30 seconds to receive $14mil ??</td></tr></table>
I don't blame them one bit. When you win a lottery, the vultures come out of the wood work. http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/ohwell.gif
Re: Right to privacy? (RoadrashPaul)
<table width="90%" cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 align=center><tr><td>Quote, originally posted by RoadrashPaul »</td></tr><tr><td class="quote">What are those people hiding that they didn't want to be on TV for 30 seconds to receive $14mil ??</td></tr></table>
Witness Protection Program??
Re: Right to privacy? (Alan S)
<table width="90%" cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 align=center><tr><td>Quote, originally posted by Alan S »</td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
I don't blame them one bit. When you win a lottery, the vultures come out of the wood work. http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/ohwell.gif </td></tr></table>
You just have to learn the word NO, Alan http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/Laugh.gif http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/Laugh.gif Hell, they can donate it to me and I will deal with the vultures with a smile on my face http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/smile.gif
Re: Right to privacy? (RoadrashPaul)
I read the article on Yahoo! about this story, before this thread was started here.
There are some questions that the lottery organization needs to ask, to be sure that the winner is of legal age, and not an employee of the lottery organization, among others. The guy who was the agent for the group (in Belize?) has had some shady sounding dealings, and he arranged a law firm to represent the group's interest. It's an interesting story, and I really don't know what to think about it, but I sure would like that $14 mil!!! I don't buy lottery tickets, 'cause bass boats are a much better investment. http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/Laugh.gif
Re: Right to privacy? (Alan S)
Alan,
I read the Entire Ordeal today (on another website).......I think they are investigating because it seems fishy that a guy who had supposedly won through a "Trust fund" set up by a Representative of it.....yet the person in question cannot be contacted and is supposed to be residing elsewhere........ http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/eyes.gif
Re: Right to privacy? (R.D.)
I would be happy to accept the money and deliver it to them in total secrecy...for a nominal fee, of course.... http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/Laugh.gif
Re: Right to privacy? (R.D.)
Has to be something fishy when a person or group doesn't want to collect $14M because they have to do it in person. I would expect all lotteries have that rule that they have the right to publicly present the money.
Re: Right to privacy? (ol man river)
the iowa govt probably expects them to pay taxes on it, whether they collect it or not.
Re: Right to privacy? (JoshKeller)
I thought most state lotteries make it known on the tickets that the state gets to use your likeness in publicity when you redeem the ticket?
Re: Right to privacy? (Al from Canada)
<table width="90%" cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 align=center><tr><td>Quote, originally posted by Al from Canada »</td></tr><tr><td class="quote">Has to be something fishy when a person or group doesn't want to collect $14M because they have to do it in person. I would expect all lotteries have that rule that they have the right to publicly present the money. </td></tr></table>
The rule has only been implemented in the last few years. When the lotteries were first started, just about everyone started a corporation and had a lawyer collect the winnings for them. For a fee, of course. That's why they had to enact the rule.
Re: Right to privacy? (Alan S)
I heard they think the ticket was stolen from the person who purchased it.
Re: Right to privacy? (Alan S)
Its just a way for a group of attorneys to take a rule and squeeze the debate out of it until it ends up in a higher court. It doesn't matter if its the lottery for 14 mill or if its a free can of dog with with a rider on it with 'strings attached' of a personal appearance. They want the law to be changed period and this is the vehicle they are using to do it with.
Re: Right to privacy? (cjtr186vmax)
enlighten me on how things get changed then in a court of law unless a group of attorneys proceeds to take the matter into court ? .....jus sayn http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/wink.gif
Re: Right to privacy? (cjtr186vmax)
Not a broad brush at all. All you have to do is read the article that Alan posted/linked to and its about as clear as muddy water. http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/Laugh.gif there are already enough litigators involved that I'm sure the winnings would be in the single digits if it was "legally' claimed by now. Of course that's not good enough for another group of attorneys,namely the "Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation and attorney general's office" so they will extract some more money from the system. meanwhile I would lay odds that either they will file charges or this other guy representing the group from Belize will file a counter suit. etc etc etc............no broad stroked here at all. http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/doh.gif But you go ahead and hold up that 'attorneys aren't in it for the money" banner all day if you want. http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/roll.gif BTW...........in my humble opinion I'm sorry I don't use the grammar that you want me to http://www.bassboatcentral.com/smileys/eyes.gif so there you go
Re: Right to privacy? (cjtr186vmax)
I have a Question, can one collect in person, and have his identity keep confidential and away from all forms of media?