2D vs Down Imaging vs Side Imaging
Here are three screen shots of the same piece of structure. Notice the fish on the structure. The 2D sensitivity is a little hot but you can tell from the 2D and DI how deep you should fish. The DI helps break out the fish a little bit better than the 2D. The SI is the ticket though.. it tells you what side of the boat and give you a great look at the structure so you know exactly what you are fishing and where it is located.
http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/t...s/S00747-1.png
http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/t...ams/S00746.png
http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/t...s/S00745-1.png
DoubleG
Re: 2D vs Down Imaging vs Side Imaging (DoubleGobble00)
Nice pics!
How's the fishing now on Ross Barnett?
I was there in May and the fishing wasn't anywhere near as good as it was when I fished there back in the 90's. Of course, it was 100 degrees out. Air boats were everywhere spraying herbicides and killing all the vegetation. Most of the lily pads were gone from Pelahatchie Bay which was my favorite spot to fish cause I lived right across the bay.
Got another trip planned for RB in mid-April next year. Ought to be a good time to be there. Hope they leave the lake alone for awhile and give it a break from all that spraying.
Re: 2D vs Down Imaging vs Side Imaging (DoubleGobble00)
Exactly! 2D and DI are useful but Side Imaging is the BOMB!
Re: 2D vs Down Imaging vs Side Imaging (BrownTrout)
Jim, I lived on the REZ for a couple of years. They killed all the pads??? WOW!! WTF for??? It was a tough but fun lake to fish.