Thread: SCOTUS Ruling

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 88
  1. Member Bub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Imperial, Mo
    Posts
    9,275
    #41
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshKeller View Post
    what happens? i start ordering more stuff directly from china, and cut out the middle man - the state government
    Alibaba

  2. Member Dando's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lamar, AR
    Posts
    30,286
    #42
    I guess SD will use their newfound income to hire enough people to attempt to enforce/collect said taxes from a few million little on-line retailers that end up owing them $7.50?
    For some reason, I see a huge problem with enforcing this across the board.
    I think the new secret color is "A-Rig"..........

  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    7,671
    #43
    Quote Originally Posted by wildturkey View Post
    I see small and new small online businesses becoming extinct. Too much time and paperwork for them to offset cost. Sad day for them. Big business is probably going to benefit the best.
    100% agree with you on this. The smaller companies wont be able to afford the accountants to keep up with everything.

  4. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cartersville, Ga
    Posts
    1,848
    #44
    Quote Originally Posted by TampaJim View Post
    Local Mom and Pop stores are the real winners here.
    And it was totally unfair to burden only some vendors.
    Now it's a level playing field. Definitely a win here.
    Burden us with origin based taxation, not destination based. How can my one person business possibly afford (time/manpower wise) to file tax in all 50 states, every month?


    --------------------------------------------------------
    Who is John Galt?


  5. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Crossville, TN & Houston, TX
    Posts
    3,466
    #45
    If the South Dakota rule is applied, then most small guys won't have to worry.

    "South Dakota is leading the legal charge, passing a law requiring the collection of sales tax on Internet vendors with at least 200 yearly transactions or $100,000 in sales to its residents."

  6. Member Dando's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lamar, AR
    Posts
    30,286
    #46
    Quote Originally Posted by bassboy1 View Post
    Burden us with origin based taxation, not destination based. How can my one person business possibly afford (time/manpower wise) to file tax in all 50 states, every month?
    It's how the U.S. Govt has been "creating jobs" for years.
    I think the new secret color is "A-Rig"..........

  7. Moderator JerryT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    90210
    Posts
    21,223
    #47
    So if I have it all shipped to NH like I always do I still won’t pay any per the stare tax ??

  8. Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Tennabama
    Posts
    3,137
    #48
    Quote Originally Posted by bassboy1 View Post
    Burden us with origin based taxation, not destination based. How can my one person business possibly afford (time/manpower wise) to file tax in all 50 states, every month?
    It's worse than that. Even if you can you are now subject to 50 times the potential to make a mistake that brings goon accountants down on your head, or they make a mistake with the same results. SD is unlikely to employ enough revenuers to chase down every little online retailer, but some of the money hungry states will use it as a reason to crawl up every single internet store's anus looking for a nickel. Open an internet store and welcome those folks into your life. No thank you!

  9. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    York SC
    Posts
    1,671
    #49
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Perry View Post
    Seems the businesses would have to pay a set tax rate to the state but the burden of dividing it up by county falls on the state itself.
    The county adds more tax on top of the state tax. Do you think the state is going to share? I do believe right now local business pay the state there share and the county there share.

  10. Moderator Mark Perry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Runaway Bay, Texas
    Posts
    82,916
    #50
    Quote Originally Posted by fishon!sc View Post
    The county adds more tax on top of the state tax. Do you think the state is going to share? I do believe right now local business pay the state there share and the county there share.

    Do you think a small business will be tasked with personally sending a check/payment to every county in the US that has bought from them? That could literally be thousands of checks per year.

  11. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cartersville, Ga
    Posts
    1,848
    #51
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Perry View Post
    Do you think a small business will be tasked with personally sending a check/payment to every county in the US that has bought from them? That could literally be thousands of checks per year.
    Everything I've read has suggested so. I'm sure there will be services that will do that for us. Intuit will probably come out with one, as will some others, but then we have to absorb the fee for that, and they won't be cheap. The accounting and bookkeeping industry is probably creaming their pants right now.

    For the items I do sell on Amazon (self fulfill, not via their website), they will take care of that (I don't sell much on there right now, but I do remember a recent sale, maybe to South Dakota, where they had a note that tax was charged, but they were remitting on my behalf).

    See why Amazon loves it? It encourages me to sell on their site, where they get a hefty cut of it, rather than my own site.


    --------------------------------------------------------
    Who is John Galt?


  12. Member Bub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Imperial, Mo
    Posts
    9,275
    #52
    Quote Originally Posted by TampaJim View Post
    Local Mom and Pop stores are the real winners here.
    And it was totally unfair to burden only some vendors.
    Now it's a level playing field. Definitely a win here.

    Small "Mom and Pop" brick and mortar businesses may see a small benefit from this ruling due to the "equal playing field" as you put it, however small and mid-size companies that have a large percentage of online sales will be hurt tremendously. This ruling may force these businesses to reduce the number of places they sell and ship to since they aren't equipped to handle the increased administration of calculating taxes for 30-50 states (and countless counties and municipalities). Since this will give customers less choice, and by default reduce competition in the online marketplace, large online retailers such as Walmart and Amazon, who are able to staff an office of employees that can efficiently track sales and make sure these taxes are being paid, will have a huge advantage! ... on a side note, they will be able to charge higher prices as well due to the reduced competition. Win Win for Amazon!

    I would prefer to eliminate ALL sales taxes, now THAT would create a level playing field. There is one huge benefit to states that have higher sales tax rates though; the people living in other states being forced to pay these high taxes online won't have the ability to vote the representatives out of office... Just another case of taxation without representation.
    Last edited by Bub; 06-21-2018 at 12:52 PM.

  13. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Topeka Kansas
    Posts
    15,884
    #53
    I forsee only one check per quarter to each State, what remains to be seen is how each State will be responsible for figuring the tax due to each County and each city. That burden may fall to each State or each State will standardize each County and city at a certain amount which would be very difficult to do. Each State might just collect the State portion and tell the Counties and cities to fend for them selves on collections.

  14. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cartersville, Ga
    Posts
    1,848
    #54
    Quote Originally Posted by D.O.C. 989 View Post
    I forsee only one check per quarter to each State, what remains to be seen is how each State will be responsible for figuring the tax due to each County and each city. That burden may fall to each State or each State will standardize each County and city at a certain amount which would be very difficult to do. Each State might just collect the State portion and tell the Counties and cities to fend for them selves on collections.
    Why would they do that? The states we already collect tax in already force us to file and remit monthly, and already place the burden of figuring the local level taxes on us as well. What fantasy land do you live on that makes you think they will change the system they've already got?


    --------------------------------------------------------
    Who is John Galt?


  15. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    York SC
    Posts
    1,671
    #55
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Perry View Post
    Do you think a small business will be tasked with personally sending a check/payment to every county in the US that has bought from them? That could literally be thousands of checks per year.
    Will be over 10000 checks per yr and yes they will have to.

  16. Member Skeeterbait's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    LA... Lower Alabama
    Posts
    5,796
    #56
    They will need to collect state tax only. There are online retail software packages that handle that now and the software manufacturer keeps up with the percentages. They will not have to collect county, city, municipal, parish, township or whatever local taxes in your area. What is claimed is that local shops cannot compete when online retailers are not having to charge tax. But they do charge shipping, even if they say it is free, their prices are inflated to cover it. So now do the local shops have advantage not having incur shipping costs?


  17. Moderator Mark Perry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Runaway Bay, Texas
    Posts
    82,916
    #57
    Quote Originally Posted by fishon!sc View Post
    Will be over 10000 checks per yr and yes they will have to.
    I am betting that does not happen. There will be a procedure like Skeeterbait mentioned above.

  18. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Topeka Kansas
    Posts
    15,884
    #58
    Quote Originally Posted by bassboy1 View Post
    Why would they do that? The states we already collect tax in already force us to file and remit monthly, and already place the burden of figuring the local level taxes on us as well. What fantasy land do you live on that makes you think they will change the system they've already got?
    I haven't seen the whole ruling, but all i've seen is that the States can now force you to collect the tax, it doesn't say who has to figure said tax. It could be very likely the States will have to have a role in telling you what to collect and remit. How could any business know every single city county and State tax rate without some assistance from each of those entities. Maybe the SCOTUS addressed that and maybe they didn't. I bet the ruling only pertains to State taxes and the other entities will be on their own to figure out how to collect what ever they want. I saw nothing addressing anything but State taxes.

  19. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Topeka Kansas
    Posts
    15,884
    #59
    What happens if you collect 50 cents sales tax from me and a day later your remittance is due, then three days later i return the item for full refund, will the State send you a check for 50 cents back? I see them going quarterly to make it easier on themselves.

  20. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Nederland, Tx
    Posts
    13,647
    #60
    I think it will be 1 state tax rate per state. What I do see happening is 2 things possibly. The logical next step is some big counties with big cities will want their share so that will go to the courts. Then I also see some politician running on the premise that they will raise the internet sales tax to help the brick and mortar businesses in the state to even the playing field.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast