Is that all your cable says? If so, I can almost guarantee whatever cut-rate Chinese factory that mfg'd your cable has never even heard of UL 1426, much less BC5W2. Look closely... I'm willing to bet that somewhere on your cable is stamped "CSA TEW" or "AWM I A/B" somewhere.
Wire manufactured to the UL1426/BC5W2 standard appears typically to also be rated for MTW/TEW/AWM applications... call it an educated guess, but I don't think wire mfg's are doing that deliberately. It's likely because BC5W2 already meets the basic MTW/TEW/AWM standards or that the basic construction has identical standards; in fact, one manufacturer's bare (untinned) MTW/TEW wire in sizes 6AWG and larger also meets BC5W2. So as far as I can tell, the primary difference between the MTW/TEW/AWM standard and the BC5W2 standard is the anti-corrosion properties of the latter (which would explain why larger sizes of bare MTW/TEW satisfy BC5W2), hence my question, has anyone used MTW/TEW/AWM and simply tinned the ends themselves to address the corrosion issue.
If you don't know the answer, there's no need to respond; people won't think less of you. People will think less of you when you repeat false information... such as how MTW wire "cannot resist water at all."