Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Titusville Florida
    Posts
    32

    Did Mercury Detune the 200 EFI in the Late 1990s? Pretty Good Evidence Here They Did.

    According to Bass & Walleye Boats magazine, it appears Mercury may have detuned the 200 EFI in 1997, 98 or 99. Bass & Walleye Boats had a 200 shootout (a competition among engines) in the April 1996 issue with Merc, Yamaha and Evinrude running their 200's on identical Champion 191 bass boats. Mercury took top speed honors by 1.1 mph and had the fastest 0 - 30 mph and 30 - 50 mph acceleration times. On the dyno the Merc showed 206 hp, the Yamaha 204 hp and the Evinrude 199 hp.

    The magazine had another 200 shootout in 1999 where the Merc 200 EFI had a poor showing. They tested 7 engines total, 2.5 liter carb and EFI Merc's and a 3.0 liter Opti, 2.6 liter carb and 3.1 liter EFI from Yamaha and 3.0 liter carb Johnson and 3.0 liter 200 Ficht Rude. The Merc 200 EFI top speed was just below middle of the pack, 2.4 mph slower than the Evinrude, and acceleration times were the worst of all the engines. Bass & Walleye Boats actually specifically said in the article the Merc 200 EFI was a big disappointment compared with 3 years earlier when it took top honors in all categories.

    I ran in bass boat circles back then and the word going around was that Merc detuned the 200 EFI because they were just trying to pull too much out of just a 2.5 liter engine, smaller than OMC's or Yamaha's blocks, and there were reliability problems and to control warranty costs. There is a Scream & Fly post from February 2013 that says Merc detuned the 2.5 liter 200's in the late 90's to try to steer people to the Optimax, and to give customers the feeling that they were getting something for their extra money buying the Opti.

    Does anyone know if Mercury changed something to lower the power output of the 200 EFI sometime in the late 1990's? In readers' experience running 200 EFI's or hearing from other boat owners, does anyone get the feeling that late 90's 200 EFI's develop less power than the earlier ones?

  2. Mercury 3L/4 Stroke/Verado Moderator EuropeanAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Greenville, SC (US)
    Posts
    94,941
    #2
    No, there was not any specific "detune" that took place.

    I suspect there was a combination of factors at play here ( and these are assuming a totally unbiased fair-play test ):

    -Engine HP can vary up to 10% of the stated HP for any one engine.

    -Comparison engines in the later comparison: Mercury was the SMALLEST displacement. Some of those engines were CONSIDERABLY larger displacement (simply not a fair comparison).


    Dual Mercury Master Technician- for Mercury Outboards, Mercruiser and Mercury Racing at European Marine in Greenville, SC.
    Still consider myself a "Marine Apprentice" after 47 years (learn something new every day).
    Mercury Parts, Mercury Outboards, Smartcraft & Accessories, Injector Service, TDR Reeds- BBC Sponsor

  3. Member cajunrgfm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Upstate Ny
    Posts
    2,698
    #3
    Port timing and exhaust porting were actually better in later FF 200 blocks, they had good potential,just not really utilized for factory fishing motors,they were basically the 200 promax block. W/ out exhaust porting and rod slots. Imo the cowling was alot heavier on later motors and they had the weaker non ratcheting lower units. The limiters were all over the map,especially from 01 up motorola electrics. Walleye guys may have one that was over propped or had a lower rpm limiter,depends who setup the hull to run, if motor was just 1 hole too low, it would kill top end.

  4. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Gainesville
    Posts
    76
    #4
    My 1998, 225 ProMax had a had a service bulletin when it was about a year old that seemed to hurt it's performance. The dealer said the fix was to aid in longevity, by remapping the fuel mixture throughout the rpm range. Seems like the ecu and spark plugs were replaced, as well as the timing retarded. It didn't run bad afterward, just seemed to be "detuned". Often wondered if there would have been a problem without the update.

  5. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    LONGVIEW TEXAS
    Posts
    13,938
    #5
    saw that bulletin
    .................................................. ...the scariest thing in life is the unknown ...................................