I just watched a PBS project about the Vietnam War. It is a new show hese kinds of incidents with people, news organizations, historians, etc. always take me back to my youth. Thirty years ago my hometown historical society, with the help of the local newspaper, wrote a historical article about an incident that happened to me and my family. When I was home to visit family these two groups called to ask me if I would review their story before publication. I said yes, I would be willing to read the story. After I finished reading the story I to be broadcast at a later date about the Vietnam War, how it was scored with music, videos, pictures, etc. The producers where making statements that much of the information was from expert historians who have studied the war. They also invited several Vietnam Vets to help with the narrative. They also discussed that the vets didn't accept the so called non Vietnam vet historians views of the war. Many times the historians described information not factual because it just didn't happen that way. Example, the historian described a tank that had a hole in the side of it was made with a hand grenade and the veteran had to correct him, the hole was caused by an RPG; the grenade could not make that kind of hole in that location of the tank. It is always interesting how historians always write history and believe they were 100% correct but were way off their information.