Thread: 77 vs 200 KHZ

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. 07-02-2016, 09:29 PM #1
    Vols824
    Vols824 is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Chattanooga. Tennessee
    Posts
    97

    77 vs 200 KHZ

    What frequency do most of you guys use for water 30ft or less?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. Larry3215
    Larry3215 is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    3,357
    #2 07-02-2016, 10:47 PM
    CHIRP now that I have it. I like it far better than any single freq I have used in the past.
    Smokercraft Phantom 202 Yamaha F115/Merc 9.9
    Garmin 7610xsv/GT51M-TM/Panoptix PS21/LiveScope
    Why am I hanging out here when I could be fishing.....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. Treeguyus
    Treeguyus is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Park Rapids, Minnesota
    Posts
    903
    #3 07-16-2016, 04:28 AM
    Agree on the use of chirp, which is multiple frequencies. In 30 ofw and less, would go with the 200. Moe selective on cone angles.

    200- 20 degree to 23 degree cone angles. For scanning a area looking for targets.
    200- 9 degree to 10 degree cone angles. For pinpointing target location for positioning boat and locating targets close to sharper inclines (narrow cone angle transducers have less dead band)

    For my walleye fishing, I like 200 kHz alot and more picky on the cone angles used for a particular fishing application within the higher KHZ range
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »