Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Lincoln, CA
    Posts
    95

    Balance issue after going to Lithiums

    I just put lithiums in and went out today and felt like my rear end was all over the place. Tried raising and lowering my jack plate to get better control but it really didn’t help the issue much. Thinking of putting some weight back there to load it up and see what happens. Anybody have the same issue after taking out AGM’s. I would imagine I’m about 180-200lbs lighter in the rear now. Any suggestions welcome. Thanks
    Last edited by Dadof4; 04-05-2024 at 10:38 PM.
    2017 Ranger Z520C
    250 Evinrude ETec With Marks HP Prop
    4 Garmins 7610 xsv with Live Scope
    10 foot Power Poles
    Dobyns Rods

  2. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    ponchatoula la
    Posts
    1,524
    #2
    Not lifting bow now.

  3. Member BigfishRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Franklington, NC.
    Posts
    451
    #3
    I lost my bow lift also. I believe this was a combination of Lithium batteries and heavier troller, and two MFDs up front. I moved all my plastics to the rear compartments, but it didn't do much. As some have said, most of our older boats were designed for heavy batteries in the back.
    2011 Ranger Z518
    Mercury Pro XS 200
    Lowrance, HDS Live, BBT mounts, Ghost, AT1, Power Poles, Charge

  4. Member 1BADAIR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    OXFORD MI
    Posts
    3,928
    #4
    I switched from an Etec to a Merc and also went to lithium at the same time. Tried a bravo first and the boat was undriveable over 60. The rear would actually jump to the right like 2 feet every time you touched the trim button. I put a Agm back in the center for weight and it didn’t do much. Switched to a Tempest for less stern lift and it helped but am gonna send it to Croxton for more cup cause I can’t get the bow up. I have a Solas on it right now to try soon.
    2011 Ranger z521/2023 250ProXS

  5. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Lincoln, CA
    Posts
    95
    #5
    I still jump up on pad quick, but the rear end just sways back and forth. I have a prop worked by Croxton on my boat now but I’m wondering if a 4 blade XL might give it more dig under throttle to keep my rear end from swaying around. I’m going to move my plastics to the rear and see what happens next trip. Also putting my blades back on so that may add some weight as well.
    2017 Ranger Z520C
    250 Evinrude ETec With Marks HP Prop
    4 Garmins 7610 xsv with Live Scope
    10 foot Power Poles
    Dobyns Rods

  6. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Houston, TX.
    Posts
    521
    #6
    Have been dealing with this issue also. This was what I used. I put three of them in the bilge. Probably not a permanent solution, but its working.

    https://www.amazon.com/BALLASTExtra-...%2C120&sr=8-40
    '17 Nitro Z21, 250ProXS serial # 2B399616, 24p Fury4, 12" Atlas, Apex 16 @ console, Apex 16 & Apex 13 @ bow, Mega 360, Ultrex, 8ft blades

  7. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Lincoln, CA
    Posts
    95
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by TXZ21 View Post
    Have been dealing with this issue also. This was what I used. I put three of them in the bilge. Probably not a permanent solution, but its working.

    https://www.amazon.com/BALLASTExtra-...%2C120&sr=8-40
    Great idea I was thinking the same thing. Just need to measure and make sure I can fit a few in there. I was thinking of filling my live wells also and seeing what the effects were. Thanks for sending the link. I appreciate it.
    2017 Ranger Z520C
    250 Evinrude ETec With Marks HP Prop
    4 Garmins 7610 xsv with Live Scope
    10 foot Power Poles
    Dobyns Rods

  8. Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tampa Florida
    Posts
    862
    #8
    I hear this a lot. I think I'll stay with lead acid and avoid these kind of problems.
    <img src=http://www.bbcboards.net/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=67225&dateline=1418512092 border=0 alt= />

  9. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Insomnia, near Seaford Delaware
    Posts
    35,652
    #9
    I don't have a Ranger. I took two AGM 31's out of the Port side of my Stratos and 100 pounds or so when I went to Lithium. She will stand on the rub rails on extremely sharp lower speed turns and oscillates slightly at speed straight ahead.
    I think adding ballast is the wrong thing, so at some time I'll move the starting AGM over to the Port side and see what happens.

  10. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Lake Mary, FL
    Posts
    3,971
    #10
    2018 Z520c with 2s ProXS and four lithium batteries. I have not noticed any issues

  11. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Huntingtown, MD
    Posts
    2,596
    #11
    I moved engine back 2 inches and that has it running better than it did before lithium.
    04 521VX 250 Pro XS
    14 521C 250 Pro XS

  12. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,508
    #12
    2014 Z521C 4 ionics 125 ah 250 pro xs 2 8ft PP Atlas Hydraulic running a fury 4 blade i have zero issues with hole shot or driving at any speed

  13. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    California
    Posts
    108
    #13
    After switching to 4 lithiums (3x 50ah & 1x 125ah) I didn't notice any issues with drivability. Holeshot improved but I did lose top end speed, only 1-3 mph. I need to lower jackplate and see what that does. My results are without changing anything in prop/engine height
    2019 Z519

  14. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Lincoln, CA
    Posts
    95
    #14
    I think I might start by adding 50-60lbs to the port side and moving some gear around to find the sweet spot then maybe look at different props. My set back is already 4 inches so not sure I want to dive into that quite yet. Thanks everyone for the thoughts and suggestions.
    2017 Ranger Z520C
    250 Evinrude ETec With Marks HP Prop
    4 Garmins 7610 xsv with Live Scope
    10 foot Power Poles
    Dobyns Rods

  15. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    885
    #15
    If your setback is 4 inches and your engine is a G1 Evinrude, you definitely would benefit from at least 4 more inches setback.

  16. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Lincoln, CA
    Posts
    95
    #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Jbass123 View Post
    If your setback is 4 inches and your engine is a G1 Evinrude, you definitely would benefit from at least 4 more inches setback.
    It’s a G2, not sure what the weight difference is between the 2 but I can check that out and list that as a possibility after I attempt to fix it with the lower level remedy’s
    2017 Ranger Z520C
    250 Evinrude ETec With Marks HP Prop
    4 Garmins 7610 xsv with Live Scope
    10 foot Power Poles
    Dobyns Rods

  17. Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    885
    #17
    The significant difference between G1 and G2 engines is that the G2 already has 4 inches of built-in setback, to add to your 4-inch plate. So you’re pretty close on total setback already. G1 and G2 engines don’t weigh much different, if that’s what you’re thinking. As others have said, a relatively easy fix would be moving weight from the front to the back, if you could. Another easy experiment is to fill your fuel and fill your livewells, then test. 200 pounds of water in the livewell makes a difference in how a boat runs, which would give you some ideas without moving or adding other weight.

  18. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Lincoln, CA
    Posts
    95
    #18
    [QUOTE=Jbass123;13458261]The significant difference between G1 and G2 engines is that the G2 already has 4 inches of built-in setback, to add to your 4-inch plate. So you’re pretty close on total setback already. G1 and G2 engines don’t weigh much different, if that’s what you’re thinking. As others have said, a relatively easy fix would be moving weight from the front to the back, if you could. Another easy experiment is to fill your fuel and fill your livewells, then test. 200 pounds of water in the livewell makes a difference in how a boat runs, which would give you some ideas without moving or adding other weight.[/QUOTE

    Yes I went and looked all this up and you hit the nail on the with set back. A friend is going to give me some of his 50lb ballast bags he used on his old ski boat and slide that in were there is a void where the batteries used to occupy the entire space and fill the live wells right off the bat and see how that works out. Thanks
    2017 Ranger Z520C
    250 Evinrude ETec With Marks HP Prop
    4 Garmins 7610 xsv with Live Scope
    10 foot Power Poles
    Dobyns Rods

  19. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Temple, Texas
    Posts
    95
    #19
    Quote Originally Posted by erickennedy1 View Post
    After switching to 4 lithiums (3x 50ah & 1x 125ah) I didn't notice any issues with drivability. Holeshot improved but I did lose top end speed, only 1-3 mph. I need to lower jackplate and see what that does. My results are without changing anything in prop/engine height
    Same with my boat...top speed was 72-73ish, now 69.7 is the best she will do.
    2013 Ranger Z521, 250 ProXS

  20. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Lincoln, CA
    Posts
    95
    #20
    Went out and fished for a day with my boys and played with it a bit. Filled the live wells when I launched and had minimal positive results. After doing the math my starboard side is 40lbs lighter and port is 46lbs lighter. I think I may put 40lb ballast bags in my rear storage compartments and see what happens next. I wouldn’t think 86lbs would make such a dramatic difference but I guess with my current set up it does.
    2017 Ranger Z520C
    250 Evinrude ETec With Marks HP Prop
    4 Garmins 7610 xsv with Live Scope
    10 foot Power Poles
    Dobyns Rods

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast