Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 101 to 109 of 109
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Posts
    10,275
    #101
    Pretty cool video and I can appreciate the engineering involved! Did you do comparative analysis on using additive manufacturing of the frames and buttons instead of milling?

  2. Member Bill Reynolds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    The Diamond State
    Posts
    3,870
    #102
    WOW!!! An amazing Engineer/Designer and he obviously understands the application parameters as well.
    I was concerned at first that the foot pedal was too fragile for the use environment but I’m over that.
    This is to forward facing sonar what the iPhone was to cell phones.

    I try to drive as if my 16 year old Grandson is following me
    Speak as if he is listening and act as if he is watching

  3. Lowrance/Garmin/GPS Moderator fishin couillon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pineville, La
    Posts
    33,134
    #103
    Are there any full photos or videos of what was on display at the classic for those of us that could not go?
    YOU are not entitled to what I have earned!!!!!

    2014 Phoenix 619 Pro / 2014 Mercury 200 Pro XS

  4. BBC SPONSOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    133
    #104
    Wow! Thank you all for the kind words. It is extremely validating to hear those comments!!

    Did you do comparative analysis on using additive manufacturing of the frames and buttons instead of milling?
    I have been 3d printing for over a decade and consider it the absolute gateway drug to making stuff. BTW, if you have a child or grandchild that likes to make things, get them a 3d printer. I currently have three of them and print dozens of parts a week with them. With that, I simply cannot imagine selling a 3d printed product that is designed to take any reasonable load, be out in the sun, or in water from a 3d printed part. Now additive metal (SLS in particular) I like but still require post processing (milling) to get the mating surfaces to the standards I require. The SLS parts are also MUCH more expensive than machining from solid 6061.

    As for general material selection, I am pretty relentless in trying everything I can to make a)durable, b)compact, c)lightweight and d)aesthetic parts. If there is a better way or material to make any of the parts I am making, then I am 100% open to it and will continue to develop this into what I hope is the best made, best designed product on the market.

    Are there any full photos or videos of what was on display at the classic for those of us that could not go?
    I have been posting to our Instagram account and have a picture of our Classic display. When we got back from the expo we realized that all of our videos were with me giving demos to Elite or BPS pros, or Lowrance, Garmin, MinnKota, and PowerPole people and I don't think it is right to post those.

    Here is a shot of our display (note the foot pedals are in frames I made to add weight as we could not screw them down).

    IMG_4641.jpg


    I will be posting more videos in the coming weeks, including details on the motor housing, transducer rail and installation videos on the Garmin and Lowrance trolling motors.

    Here is a quick one to close the discussion on the strength of the foot pedal:


    Thanks again for the comments!!

  5. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Kansas City, KS
    Posts
    1,319
    #105
    How responsive is the “follow trolling motor” function? I played around with the idea of a magnetic clutch to engage/disengage from the TM shaft because no matter what I do I cannot get the follow trolling motor function to keep up enough for chasing fish around in open water. I think this is the area that will really make or break a device like this. I hope you can make it work!

  6. BBC SPONSOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    133
    #106
    How responsive is the “follow trolling motor” function?
    The response on my system is instant. There is zero lag between any of the inputs (foot control, trolling motor, or NMEA compass heading). There is also zero drift as I use an absolute position sensor on my output for closed loop motion.

    The only issue you might have, or notice, is that the trolling motor can accelerate and turn faster than my motor. The Lowrance engineer I spoke with in Tulsa said they have a 75 RMP motor turning of their trolling motor. We currently are using 12 rpm motors in our test units. I do have a planetary gear motor being made to my specification (at significant cost) for us to test that is coming in a couple different and higher RPM. These should be here in a week or two at the most to test. But at best they will be half the speed of the trolling motor.

    If your are into this stuff:

    One major issue with these small gear motors in this application is that they don't like to, or simply can't 'back spin.' Back spin is simply the ability to force the motor to twist by hand (or stump). Most of the products in this space use a small worm drive motor. They have zero back spin capability and will simply break (motor, shaft, pin, etc) when forced backward. They also have an issue that when they are in the stowed position, the weight of the transducer is "bound" to that gear stack due to the hysteresis in the worm mechanism. This makes long term stow running in rough water (or even driving down the road) a major concern.

    The motors we have been testing (dozens and dozens of them btw) will do the same when the RMP rating of the motor is under 20. 20 to 30 RMP they will backspin on occasion, over that we can get a reliable back spin. Our ability to 'park' the transducer against the frame when stowed is big design feature and is there specifically to remove the gravity/twisting load of the transducer(s) from the motor.

    The question might be asked, why not just increase the RMP then. Well, the problem with higher RMP gear motors is that they lose torque and therefore require a stronger electric portion to meet my requirement of moving 3 transducers. To offset this, you increase the size of the electric portion of the motor but then you end up with a bigger motor, you increase the current draw, which increases the size of the motor driver, which increase the size of the capacitors for the motor driver and creates packaging problems, and on and on.

    Motor and driver selection is the biggest challenge I have faced with the design of this product as the tradeoffs are simply not possible to engineer around.

  7. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    27
    #107
    Plan's for a PP Move unit ?

  8. Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Kansas City, KS
    Posts
    1,319
    #108
    My system uses a 20k RPM motor. Yep you read that right.

    The other thing I have found which has been a big issue is that my system creates a ton of RFI when activated. I haven’t really played around with trying to alleviate it so it might be as simple as some shielding or a loop in the wires. May also be related to the (unnecessary) high amp draw of the motor haha

    The last thing I think that will be another challenge to adoption will be a position indicator in line of sight. Whether it’s a hard arrow linked directly to the drive or a remote digital indicator thats placed somewhere higher than at the feet, I think if you can figure out a way for a guy not to have to look down at the pedal to know the position once he takes his foot off will be a nice feature.

    Exciting for you to share this development.

  9. BBC SPONSOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    133
    #109
    Plan's for a PP Move unit ?
    Force, Ghost, Ultrex Quest, Ultrex, then if demand is sufficient - Powerpole Move.

    Here's a short video from a full day testing yesterday. This is Trolling Motor Sync mode with new 18rpm planetary gear motor that we had made. It is faster, stronger, much more durable and can free or back spin when forced!! It had zero trouble moving a LVS62 in perspective mode (62 in perspective is unreal BTW) and a LVS34 in forward while trolling at nearly 4mph and my battery producing 10v.


Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456