From CNBC this morning, 10 years ago, 82% of energy consumption globally was using fossil fuels. Today, after trillions of investments and government subsidies, fossil fuels consumption has fallen all the way to only 81%…..
From CNBC this morning, 10 years ago, 82% of energy consumption globally was using fossil fuels. Today, after trillions of investments and government subsidies, fossil fuels consumption has fallen all the way to only 81%…..
I heard that yesterday morning from a guy on CNBC. I chuckled.Originally Posted by bassdge
Makes you wonder where all the money that was supposed to be invested went.
BulletTJ
Tim
There is never a wrong time
to do the right thing!
4 years ago this wasn't even a concern.
Into the special peoples pockets...
in 10 years energy consumption increased 12%, so it sounds like renewables and maybe nuclear made up the difference. Good. Maybe we should divert the trillions given to the fossil fuel industry to renewables and make even more progress.
Thanos was the hero
If by giving trillions to fossil fuel companies you mean by going by the u s tax code. The tax code could always b changed by Congress.
And i'm gonna guess that they are all excited about a 1% drop in usage.....
YOU are not entitled to what I have earned!!!!!
2014 Phoenix 619 Pro / 2014 Mercury 200 Pro XS
The number spent was around $3.1 trillion on renewables. Just pissing into the wind.
just pissing into spinning wind mills
Thanos was the hero
Our Govenor, Glen Younkin, said no to solar panels and wind mills. In stead he wants Nuclear plants. Make the Most sense!
The only reason it only fell this much is because of the FF required to manufacture the alternative energy.
Once all of these devices are in full production to reap the benefits, it'll be time to make new ones.
Maybe by then, we will see another 1% reduction.
Life makes sense once again.
The US oil and gas sector get billions in tax relief, not trillions. And if they took that away, you would probably be paying for it, and more, at the pump.
I don't understand why they can't say yes to all 3 in addition to existing energy? I get there are political talking points on all sides, but frankly the government is going to get involved on all fronts anyway so why don't they diversify now instead of trying to please one lobby?
In other words Socialism is good if it benefits the chosen??
it sure the hell does! Follow the money as usual. Thanks.The only reason it only fell this much is because of the FF required to manufacture the alternative energy.
Once all of these devices are in full production to reap the benefits, it'll be time to make new ones.
Maybe by then, we will see another 1% reduction.
Life makes sense once again.
My bad I thought we were talking global not just the US.
And of course it would cost more at the pump. Would jut make my Tesla pay for itself even quicker
Thanos was the hero
Has the technology changed so that creation of cooling ponds and reservoirs are no longer needed? I'm thinking in particular of places like Lake Anna. That was a lot of area to flood.
Azure AZ200 (with stuff like cupholders, bathroom and table)
Can anyone share a link to this please?
I have owned Exon stock for many years. They are making it clear that they are getting out of the oil business. That alone must tell you something.
Reply With Quote