Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. ecoast
    ecoast is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Location
    on Lake Hartwell in Westminster, SC 29693
    Posts
    737
    #21 09-22-2021, 10:31 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Wayne P. View Post
    Lower frequencies don't have as much range and depth as higher frequencies, but up to 100' is no problem with the MEGA frequency.





    respectfully disagree


    All I have ever seen:

    Low frequency = deeper

    high = more detail
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. Wayne P.
    Wayne P. is online now
    Member Wayne P.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    30,445
    #22 09-22-2021, 10:50 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ecoast View Post
    respectfully disagree


    All I have ever seen:

    Low frequency = deeper

    high = more detail
    You are correct, I stated that backwards. I will correct my post.
    Wayne Purdum
    Charlottesville, Va.
    Helix 12 CHIRP MEGA+ SI G3N/G4N, Helix 15 CHIRP MEGA SI+ GPS G4N
    SOLIX 12 SI/G3, Helix 8 CHIRP MEGA SI+ G4N, Ultrex 80/LINK, MEGA360,
    MEGA LIVE, LIVE TL
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. bencherry121
    bencherry121 is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Hopkinsville ky
    Posts
    292
    #23 09-23-2021, 02:53 AM
    Use 455 hz on down imaging to see fish better. I fish Great Lakes a lot and I prefer down imaging over 2d. It is hard to see if they are on the bottom in the chunky rocks but there will usually be a little separation from the fish and rocks.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »