Lund is marketed as the best aluminum boat on the market. However, the warranty only covers double riveted seams for the life of ownership, that leaves all single rivets subject to failure. The decks are made of wood and I think most would agree wood will rot, it's not if but when. I believe Lund covers the wood for the life but who wants to rip out their entire deck? The aluminum hull thickness, it's double plated on the bow but everywhere else the aluminum is thin compared to the competition. So given these factors, what makes Lund superior to say a Ranger aluminum boat that has a lifetime warranty on the transom, internal ribs, and external welds? Ranger does not use any wood anywhere in the boat. The aluminum is .125 throughout, not just on the bow.
So why is Lund the best? I love the Lund layout but I just don't understand the superior "quality", especially when the Lund warranty is inferior to the competition.