Sounds like you've got a handle on it now.
Btw, the "fs" model on the bravos is for "four stroke" that's why they don't have the xtra holes like the xs bravos because they are not needed with the extra torque on the four stokes.
Sounds like you've got a handle on it now.
Btw, the "fs" model on the bravos is for "four stroke" that's why they don't have the xtra holes like the xs bravos because they are not needed with the extra torque on the four stokes.
24’Bass Cat Puma Sts-300 Proxs
23’Gatortrax Gt tunnel hull-200 Suzuki
Yep. I tested lots of props when the ranger 621fs came out. they moved the consoles forward 6"vs the VS and the 350 vrod came out and required 3 bolts per side. lowering it on transom 2". My 350 621fs was one of the first. went 55. terrible bow rise. worked with Scott riechow at merc. Had to add a jack plate to get motor up. And tested rev 4, LT, and FS props. My wife finally said they have to stop sending you all the heavy boxes. When we were done I had a 22.5 LT and jackplate at 10. Saw 64.1 just me light load with 5mph wind at my back. Had Stern lift and bow down on hole shot. So not my first prop testing go around... 55 and terrible performance (dangerous as couldn't see forward until 22mph) vs 64 and level start. All with prop change and motor height change.
A year or two later ranger stopped shipping 3 blade tempests and low and behold FS 22's on their 620/621s...