So, let me get this straight. The guy is "absolutely wrong" when it comes to the clarity of Fluorocarbon line, but absolutely correct in disproving that Fluorocarbon has no stretch. Got it, I'm so glad we can pick and chose what science is correct when coming from the same source...
So basically we have come to the point of agreeance. Fluoro is not perfectly clear, just pretty good and the best we have. Fluorocarbon does stretch, but while fishing it is more sensitive because it takes more force to stretch it. I'm glad we had this conversation and are in agreance in everything I told you about Fluoro in my first post.