I bought my current 2002 Ranger from Joe. He lived in Ohio in 05. It had 2 Bottomline state of the art monster FF's on it. And came with a spare unit. Very expensive set up back then. I asked Joe then "why all the electronics?".
He said that he would put the boat back on the trailer rather than fish if could not use his electronics on Lake Erie. Joe was a hammer on the great lakes back then. He fished a lot of wrecks and pioneered the offshore bite.
He's not being a hypocrite when he states his observations on the state of bass fishing most relating to the competitive side.
I agree with him 100% in that Panopix and the like give anglers a distinct advantage on SOME bodies of water. As well, anglers are discovering more places where this technology works to their advantage. A small lake tournament location that our circuit has fished for years was completely dominated by the anglers with forward looking tech in their boat this summer. 2 or 3 events this year were won with 20-22 lbs of smallies where traditionally 17-18 lb of LM would win.
They found bait balls in the clear end of the lake that had previously undiscovered schools of big smallies following. Most knew that there were big SM there but it was random at best. The new tech enabled guys to follow the bait thus following the bass.
Had that circuit selected that body of water for our classic location it would have come down to those few boats that had that tech competing for a $70,000 Basscat as the rest of us competed for a top ten. Not complaining! Just saying.
I am an older guy who has relied on sight fishing smallies and power fishing LM on most of our tournament locations. I doubt that I will drop 5K to add another unit to my boat but you never know.
What Joe was getting to I think is that guys like us are kinda getting left behind. But we have always had to pick our tournament techniques that suit our strengths and preferences. Just nowadays they cost a lot more $.