Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 88
  1. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Clanton, Al
    Posts
    886
    #41
    The flash for the 75 Opti 2 stroke has always performed better than the 4 stroke. To gain the performance with the Opti it required the flash, removing the air restrictor, a 6" jackplate, and a Laser II 24P prop. My 2012 topped out @51mph turning 6100 rpm. It would cruise @43mph turning 5600 rpm. Not say that it isnt possible but I have not seen or read of results from a 4 stroke equaling the results of the 2 stroke. Another thing to remember is that each aluminum hull is different from the other and none of them are true.
    2023 Triton 18TRX
    2023 Mercury 200 Pro XS
    80# Ultrex IPilot Link
    Helix 12 Mega SI & Garmin Livescope w/ 1242XSV GPSmap

  2. Member TritonTRXV8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Northern Ca
    Posts
    22,002
    #42
    Just as it was with the opti there is more different between the mots than just the computer tune. On the opti the 75 and 90 had different block porting than the 115 and each had a different throttle body bore even without the restrictor plate. On the 4 strokes i would imagine theres a throttle body difference and if i remember correctly a different camshaft between the 75 and 90 to the 115. Neither will ever perform like a true 115 but obviously the 4 strokes miss the bar by a bit more.
    Roy
    2020 Triton 18 Trx
    Mercury 200 Pro XS V8
    Bravo FS 24P Prop
    Atlas 6” jp
    Dual Humminbird Helix 10 MEGA SI
    Minnkota Ultrex.

  3. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Newman, CA
    Posts
    5,165
    #43
    Quote Originally Posted by TritonTRXV8 View Post
    Just as it was with the opti there is more different between the mots than just the computer tune. On the opti the 75 and 90 had different block porting than the 115 and each had a different throttle body bore even without the restrictor plate. On the 4 strokes i would imagine theres a throttle body difference and if i remember correctly a different camshaft between the 75 and 90 to the 115. Neither will ever perform like a true 115 but obviously the 4 strokes miss the bar by a bit more.
    The main difference between the 75 and 115 is the camshaft. Throttle body, injectors, etc are all the same.

  4. Member TritonTRXV8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Northern Ca
    Posts
    22,002
    #44
    Must be a pretty big difference in the cam then. Doesnt seem like alot of gain for the cost of the flash. I remember seeing guys running 40-42 with stock 75 optis on this hull.
    Roy
    2020 Triton 18 Trx
    Mercury 200 Pro XS V8
    Bravo FS 24P Prop
    Atlas 6” jp
    Dual Humminbird Helix 10 MEGA SI
    Minnkota Ultrex.

  5. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Newman, CA
    Posts
    5,165
    #45
    Quote Originally Posted by TritonTRXV8 View Post
    Must be a pretty big difference in the cam then. Doesnt seem like alot of gain for the cost of the flash. I remember seeing guys running 40-42 with stock 75 optis on this hull.
    Recall the main difference being the gear ratio.

  6. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    102
    #46
    Quote Originally Posted by bshort View Post
    Recall the main difference being the gear ratio.
    There are/were two gearcase option: 2.07 & 2.33

  7. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SW Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,781
    #47
    Seems like the lower gear ratio lower responds better to the tune. Maybe just better props for that ratio.
    Quote Originally Posted by msupc View Post
    There are/were two gearcase option: 2.07 & 2.33

  8. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    102
    #48
    Quote Originally Posted by alanhore View Post
    Seems like the lower gear ratio lower responds better to the tune. Maybe just better props for that ratio.
    There is definitely a difference somewhere. I just got the Vengeance prop back from getting cup added and a little bit of pitch so I am told. I will try her out this weekend (potentially tomorrow afternoon) and report back with my findings! The nice gentleman at East Tennessee Propeller seemed to believe that raising the engine probably hurt more than it helped, but testing the newly modified prop would ultimately help clarify that. He suggested even a small (4") jack plate may provide the opportunity for more precise fine tuning. I haven't even begun to consider a jackplate, so that is foreign territory for me honestly.

  9. Member TritonTRXV8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Northern Ca
    Posts
    22,002
    #49
    Your prop guy is right about the jack plate. You will never dial it in to get ever mph out of it if that is what you are seeking without a jack plate. It comes down to 1/16” increments to truly fine tune the engine hieght and to run high you need setback as well.
    Roy
    2020 Triton 18 Trx
    Mercury 200 Pro XS V8
    Bravo FS 24P Prop
    Atlas 6” jp
    Dual Humminbird Helix 10 MEGA SI
    Minnkota Ultrex.

  10. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    102
    #50
    Quote Originally Posted by TritonTRXV8 View Post
    Your prop guy is right about the jack plate. You will never dial it in to get ever mph out of it if that is what you are seeking without a jack plate. It comes down to 1/16” increments to truly fine tune the engine height and to run high you need setback as well.
    Well I had it out this past weekend with again underwhelming results. The newly cupped prop essentially performed the same as before. I believe I am going to put a 6" jack plate on from Vance Manufacturing based on input I have received here and various other places.

  11. Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Milford Ohio
    Posts
    2,129
    #51
    Tell us what your goal is maybe someone can help or point you in the right direction.

  12. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    102
    #52
    Quote Originally Posted by fishon396 View Post
    Tell us what your goal is maybe someone can help or point you in the right direction.
    I would like to maximize the boat's top speed while having a good hole shot. I just ordered the Vance 6" manual jack plate model JPL4500 with the performance plate and stainless steel bolts, and it should be here Wednesday at the latest. I will start around 5-1/2" below pad and go from there.

  13. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Newman, CA
    Posts
    5,165
    #53
    Quote Originally Posted by msupc View Post
    Well I had it out this past weekend with again underwhelming results. The newly cupped prop essentially performed the same as before. I believe I am going to put a 6" jack plate on from Vance Manufacturing based on input I have received here and various other places.
    You might pick up a mph or two with that. At the end of the day, that 75 can only give you so much.

  14. Member TritonTRXV8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Northern Ca
    Posts
    22,002
    #54
    If the ecm flash on these 4 strokes only gains you 2-3 mph then i would think it best to save your money. You dont have any shops nearby that demo props really think you need to try a 19p laser prop on there. Even that vengeance with work done to it i doubt would compete with an out of the box laser.
    Roy
    2020 Triton 18 Trx
    Mercury 200 Pro XS V8
    Bravo FS 24P Prop
    Atlas 6” jp
    Dual Humminbird Helix 10 MEGA SI
    Minnkota Ultrex.

  15. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    102
    #55
    I installed the jackplate from Vance last night - Model # JPL4500 w/6" setback and performance plate add-on. I set the center of prop height at 5.5" from the bottom of the boat; it was approximately 5.25" previously. I will try to take it out this weekend with the 18" cupped Vengeance prop for testing and report back.

    IMG_8457.JPG

  16. Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pueblo West
    Posts
    1,612
    #56
    Quote Originally Posted by msupc View Post
    I installed the jackplate from Vance last night - Model # JPL4500 w/6" setback and performance plate add-on. I set the center of prop height at 5.5" from the bottom of the boat; it was approximately 5.25" previously. I will try to take it out this weekend with the 18" cupped Vengeance prop for testing and report back.

    IMG_8457.JPG
    looks nice for sure but as someone else said. It’s a 75 and maybe 115 flashed but it doesn’t sound like it. A person on walleyecentral not seeing any performance increase after having a 90 flashed.

    At what point do you just upgrade the boat?

  17. Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    931
    #57
    Quote Originally Posted by msupc View Post
    I purchased a 2017 Tracker 175TXW w/ 75HP Mercury Fourstroke in November of 2019. At the time of purchase, it had a 18" pitch Vengeance prop. The boat would make 39-40mph @ roughly 5400 RPM. I was looking to increase speed and performance and learned, through searching the forums, that the intake restricting plate could be removed to add power (essentially turning it into a 90hp engine). I removed the plate and took the boat out, and under full-throttle the Mercury Monitor would kill power once on plane. I was able to achieve 40mph @ 5250 RPM with the 18" pitch prop and restricting ring removed, but I could not go full throttle.

    I thought that the factor tachometer may be off, and I was running into the limiter, so I purchased a 21" pitch Spitfire X7 prop and put it on. I was then able to achieve 39-40 mph, and the engine would only spin up to 4700 rpm roughly. Again, once under full throttle, the Mercury Monitor would kill power. I later deduced this to the engine running lean?

    I then decided to send my ECM off to be flashed by Simon Performance hoping that the increased power would spin the 21" prop faster and increase speed. I received the ECM back this week and took the boat out. Now with the 21" Spitfire X7 prop I could only spin it to 5200 rpm @ 41mph. I decided to swap the 18" Vengeance prop back on, and the RPM increased to 5800-6000 (depending on trim) and can see 42 MAYBE 43 MPH.

    Does this sound right to you all? I have seen all of ship's and other's posts regarding flashing their 75 Optimax's to 115, and they are spinning 24" laser 2's and seeing 48-50 MPH.

    This is all with only me in the boat (195lb), half a tank of fuel, and rods/reels and tackle. Also, the engine is mounted in the second hole from the top.
    Got a friend with same boat number 1 18 pitch is to high for that engine . Should have a 17 pitch and far as a 21 pitch you are way off. 43 sounds right doubtful you’ll get much more than that . Change to a 17 pitch that boat will jump and go proably closer to max rpm.
    J D
    Last edited by Chainslinger1959; 03-14-2020 at 01:08 PM.

  18. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    102
    #58
    So I had her out this weekend for some test and tuning and the results were quite intriguing. Please see below:

    Saturday - 18" Cupped Vengeance
    First run was with the jack plate set at 4.5" below "V"
    Average MPH was 41 @ 5800 RPM
    Second run with jack plate set at 4.25" below "V"
    Average MPH was 41.5 @ 5900 RPM
    Third Run was with jack plate set at 4" below "V"
    Average MPH was 40.5 @ 5900 RPM

    This yielded, to me, an optimal setting somewhere around 4.5" to 4.25" below "V"

    Sunday - 21" Spitfire X7
    First run was with jack plate set at 4.5" below "V"
    Average MPH was 43.5 @ 5200 RPM
    Second run was with jack plate set at 4.25" below "V"
    Average MPH was 43 @ 5250 RPM

    This is where things get interesting. I decided to attempt to trim the motor all the way up while running, and the results were a maximum of 48 MPH @ 5200 RPM! Once I trimmed past the point of the prop "chopping" it smoothed out, lift increased, and speed increased substantially. I had done this before the jack plate, and the results were not the same. This was with the engine sitting at 4.25" below "V". Visual inspection yielded plenty of water streaming out of the engine and the ventilation plate sitting just above the water's surface. I lifted the jack plate up to 4" below "V", but speed decreased.

    Results: With the Spitfire X7 I can now achieve 45-48 MPH @ 5200 RPM fully trimmed out. The motor literally will not trim up any more. Steering is not bad at this point, and I feel satisfied with everything. I found it to be strange however.

    What say you all?

    *EDIT*
    By the way, it is important when setting the prop to pad that you level the pad or "V" in this instance before setting/measuring the distance. I thought I was 5.5" before, but once I leveled the "V" and the ventilation plate, I discovered that it was actually 4.5".

  19. Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Newman, CA
    Posts
    5,165
    #59
    With the X7, how was your time to plane? Too bad you couldn’t try at 17p X7

  20. Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    102
    #60
    Quote Originally Posted by bshort View Post
    With the X7, how was your time to plane? Too bad you couldn’t try at 17p X7
    With the X7 once pegged, RPMs jump to about 3200 and climb until plane. I would guess it takes 3-4 seconds to plane. With the 18" Vengeance it is probably a second to a second a half quicker and hits 4k once pegged.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast