Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Member judecca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Lake Camelot, IL
    Posts
    158

    Loomis for weightless plastics

    Looking for recommendations for which Loomis rod i should go with for weightless plastics, senkos, flukes, etc. Here's what i know so far:
    1. Baitcasting
    2. GLX or better quality
    3. Prefer something in the 7'-7'6" range

    Thoughts on rod power & series?

    Thanks in advance.... -Ryan W.
    Phoenix 920 Pro XP
    Mercury 250R
    Minn Kota Ultrex 112# iPilot Link
    Garmin GPSMap 1243xsv + 1243xsv @ Helm
    Garmin GPSMap 7616xsv + 1243xsv / Dual Livescope+ @ Bow

  2. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,876
    #2
    NRX 893 is your rod. Or GLX 893 if you need a less expensive option.

    If you desire versatility the MBR 843 rods are perfect for a weightless plastic or a whole host of other things. There was NRX 843 but it may be discontinued if memory serves me right. There for sure is a current GLX 843 that would be easily attainable

  3. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cincinnati Metro
    Posts
    4,017
    #3
    893 NRX and thank the board. makes a very nice shakey head rod as well. Need about 5/16th oz total weight rig to load it. I fish 30# braid on my 893 with a 16 Shimano Met MGL. Just incredible
    2024 Phoenix 818
    2024 merc 175 pro xs 3B411947

  4. Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    SW Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,783
    #4
    Agree with the above post NRX893 is your rod.

  5. Member Black Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lees Summit, Mo.
    Posts
    5,029
    #5
    Yep 893 glx , 893 nrx

  6. BBC SPONSOR reelex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Hidden Valley Lake, CA
    Posts
    2,886
    #6
    if your going to be skipping docks or structure with senko or flukes GLX843mbr.
    " Serious Service for the Serious Angler"

  7. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    joliet
    Posts
    4,198
    #7
    Love the 893 have 2 and want another but I wouldn’t want to work a fluke on a 89” rod. I’d look at the 843,853 or 852 if covers not a big issue
    Nitro z21

  8. Winter can end now..... BoatBuggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    St Lawrence Ontario / Sam Rayburn TX
    Posts
    12,242
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by jasonG View Post
    Love the 893 have 2 and want another but I wouldn’t want to work a fluke on a 89” rod. I’d look at the 843,853 or 852 if covers not a big issue
    +1 (but I only have one 893 and don't really need another.....)

    My favorite fluke rod is an NRX 803 but I don't tend to bomb flukes around - I generally make short casts/skips to targets.
    2013 Ranger Z520c, 2013 Yamaha 250 SHO
    2018 Ranger RT198p, 2013 Mercury 150 Optimax

  9. Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Rapid City, SD
    Posts
    1,346
    #9
    843!

  10. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Andover, Minnesota
    Posts
    965
    #10
    I ran a GLX 893C all year this summer... And I just sold it. I really wasn't blown away by the sensitivity of the GLX version. It was honestly just.. average. I'd spring for the NRX if you're looking at that specific blank.
    I come from the land of the ice and snow.
    YouTube: PunchFishing

  11. Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Cincinnati Metro
    Posts
    4,017
    #11
    Quote Originally Posted by BoatBuggy View Post
    +1 (but I only have one 893 and don't really need another.....)

    My favorite fluke rod is an NRX 803 but I don't tend to bomb flukes around - I generally make short casts/skips to targets.
    yes, the 803 would be my preference for the fluke but I like the 893 for the 5 inch senko better. I guess it depends on primary application
    2024 Phoenix 818
    2024 merc 175 pro xs 3B411947

  12. BBC SPONSOR reelex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Hidden Valley Lake, CA
    Posts
    2,886
    #12
    Quote Originally Posted by punch View Post
    I ran a GLX 893C all year this summer... And I just sold it. I really wasn't blown away by the sensitivity of the GLX version. It was honestly just.. average. I'd spring for the NRX if you're looking at that specific blank.
    the GLX is the same blank as the NRX. Different guide train.
    " Serious Service for the Serious Angler"

  13. Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Andover, Minnesota
    Posts
    965
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by reelex View Post
    the GLX is the same blank as the NRX. Different guide train.
    Are you sure about that? :-/
    I come from the land of the ice and snow.
    YouTube: PunchFishing

  14. Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    joliet
    Posts
    4,198
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by reelex View Post
    the GLX is the same blank as the NRX. Different guide train.
    That doesn’t surprise me one bit especially when the green GLX models were a flop. I just wish loomis and croix would just keep all models the same throughout the product line and let price and feature separate them
    Nitro z21

  15. Member Black Haze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lees Summit, Mo.
    Posts
    5,029
    #15
    I doubt that....the 894 blanks arent even close
    Quote Originally Posted by reelex View Post
    the GLX is the same blank as the NRX. Different guide train.

  16. BBC SPONSOR reelex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Hidden Valley Lake, CA
    Posts
    2,886
    #16
    there are two different 894 rods in GLX and one in NRX. The JWRs are the same, the GLX FPR is different. Dan
    " Serious Service for the Serious Angler"

  17. Member judecca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Lake Camelot, IL
    Posts
    158
    #17
    I appreciate all the advice guys, thanks for taking the time... and I'm sensing a theme (893) .
    Last questions is about series/taper. I recently acquired a GLX 844 MBR for Jigs and its been outstanding IMO.
    Should I stick with the JWR, or consider the MBR?

    -Ryan W.
    Phoenix 920 Pro XP
    Mercury 250R
    Minn Kota Ultrex 112# iPilot Link
    Garmin GPSMap 1243xsv + 1243xsv @ Helm
    Garmin GPSMap 7616xsv + 1243xsv / Dual Livescope+ @ Bow

  18. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,876
    #18
    Quote Originally Posted by judecca View Post
    I appreciate all the advice guys, thanks for taking the time... and I'm sensing a theme (893) .
    Last questions is about series/taper. I recently acquired a GLX 844 MBR for Jigs and its been outstanding IMO.
    Should I stick with the JWR, or consider the MBR?

    -Ryan W.
    Up to you. IMO jig and worm rod are one trick ponies. They are what their name implies. When it comes to technique specific presentations they do exactly what they are intended to do. The 893 is made precisely for feel presentations right around 3/8 oz give or take. It wasn’t deigned to be versatile. I wouldn’t say it would not make a good frog rod, flipping stick, chatterbaits or topwater rod for example.

    But the MBR 843 ( the step down in power from your 844) isn’t designed for any one thing, rather many. It is not designed exclusively for jigs or plastics, rather a mutlitide of techniques that fall within the rods lure ratings. Good rods for spinnerbaits, chatterbaits, Small swimbaits, jigs, swimjigs, Texas rigs, weightless plastics, topwater etc.

    My question to you is do you want a rod you can specifically designate for something or would rather have versatility? Note: if you are planning on keeping your 844 you already have versatility covered. I would opt for the 893. The NRX 893 rods come up for sale quite often on here for $350-425. If you find it wasn’t what you thought you could sell it for that much rather quickly