Search:

Type: Posts; User: vik

Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Thread: CV52 vs Totalscan

    by vik
    Replies
    71
    Views
    4,553

    Yes, it can miss small objects when sensitivity...

    Yes, it can miss small objects when sensitivity setting is low, actualy the same way as it happens on Lowrance units (see in red):
    ...
  2. Thread: CV52 vs Totalscan

    by vik
    Replies
    71
    Views
    4,553

    Depth is 12.7m or 40feet, the CV52 sees the tree...

    Depth is 12.7m or 40feet, the CV52 sees the tree which is pretty far on the left (cast shadow) with both beams. DI is very strong and distinct due to propper settings...
  3. Thread: CV52 vs Totalscan

    by vik
    Replies
    71
    Views
    4,553

    It is just a matter of set sensitivity...

    It is just a matter of set sensitivity (gain/contrast....) to get the same strength of DI images on all those units including CV CHIRP. Dedicated Down element do not use full capacity for all depths...
  4. Thread: CV52 vs Totalscan

    by vik
    Replies
    71
    Views
    4,553

    There is no GAP under the boat - there is an...

    There is no GAP under the boat - there is an overlap of left and right beam, and it was proved by Leonard for very deep water 87ft where both beams see the same tree which is directly under the boat...
  5. Thread: CV52 vs Totalscan

    by vik
    Replies
    71
    Views
    4,553

    It matters because we are discussing technical...

    It matters because we are discussing technical part of image comparison, but not a wrong Garmin or Lowrance marketing. You are telling that Lowrance made more precise side by side comparison than...
  6. Thread: CV52 vs Totalscan

    by vik
    Replies
    71
    Views
    4,553

    A couple of inches....LOL :smile: It could be no...

    A couple of inches....LOL :smile: It could be no gap at all, or 3-5 feet between the transducers it would not change anything in their comparison because they did not use them simultaneously. This...
  7. Thread: CV52 vs Totalscan

    by vik
    Replies
    71
    Views
    4,553

    CV52 image is correct - there is nothing on the...

    CV52 image is correct - there is nothing on the left. Ti is adding DI returns to both SI sides showing the same objects at both SI side views, mixing them under the boat, which are actually at one...
  8. Replies
    10
    Views
    4,308

    Actually this is Lowrance who lies about the CV...

    Actually this is Lowrance who lies about the CV transducers saying that there is a GAP directly under the boat, but there is no empty space just a left and right beams overlap, and CV does not miss...
  9. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    Looks like this is the only way to see how DI...

    Looks like this is the only way to see how DI returns effect the SI views, and it would be really interesting.
  10. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    Excellent DI view - sensitivity setting is just...

    Excellent DI view - sensitivity setting is just ideal on it :smile: How did you do this? Manually? As far as I know automatic sensitivity provides lower DI sensitivity comparing with the same SI...
  11. Thread: Garmin striker 7sv

    by vik
    Replies
    15
    Views
    1,109

    Lowrance overlaid DI shadows do effect the SI...

    Lowrance overlaid DI shadows do effect the SI shadows ( not Striker 7 GT52 and CV52):
    http://www.bbcboards.net/showthread.php?t=827658&page=11
    ...
  12. Thread: Garmin striker 7sv

    by vik
    Replies
    15
    Views
    1,109

    Yes, this is a right SI side from HDS-12 unit...

    Yes, this is a right SI side from HDS-12 unit
    http://www.bbcboards.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=292578&stc=1 :

    Do you see any shadows on DI view which are on SI views? No? But they "should...
  13. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    Sriker 7sv works great at 455kHz - there is no...

    Sriker 7sv works great at 455kHz - there is no any singes of any ghost lines on SI views, and CV DI is good at 26ft at least, bottom is bright and nothing is missed. I am sure Striker CV DI will be...
  14. Thread: Garmin striker 7sv

    by vik
    Replies
    15
    Views
    1,109

    Are you kidding? :smile: Dedicated DI almost...

    Are you kidding? :smile: Dedicated DI almost never shows shadows on it's DI view on leveled bottom (no slope), because that shadow on one DI beam side will be covered with brighter reflections of...
  15. Thread: Garmin striker 7sv

    by vik
    Replies
    15
    Views
    1,109

    It does not work with Lowrance units at all -...

    It does not work with Lowrance units at all - they always have Null/ghost lines at any frequencies, and always get SI and DI overlays (cross-talks).
  16. Thread: Garmin striker 7sv

    by vik
    Replies
    15
    Views
    1,109

    You are talking about your Garmin GT51 which...

    You are talking about your Garmin GT51 which works the same way as HDS - pining at the same time, having ghost lines at both 455 and 800kHz, having SI and DI beams overlays and semitransparent ...
  17. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    Striker 7sv always has Null/ghost lines at...

    Striker 7sv always has Null/ghost lines at 800kHz, and never has them at 455kHz, but Lowrance always has them at both frequencies. Striker 7sv does not have waffler ghost lines at any frequencies,...
  18. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    These are definitely Null/ghost lines. Striker 7...

    These are definitely Null/ghost lines. Striker 7 always has them with GT52 and CV52 at 800kHz (not at 455kHz), and Lowrance always has them at 800 and 455kHz.
  19. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    This is not ghosting - this is just a double...

    This is not ghosting - this is just a double bottom reflection at doubled depth because of high sensitivity.
  20. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    Exelent DI at 32ft :) It would be great to see...

    Exelent DI at 32ft :) It would be great to see CV52 Striker screen shots at 455kHz at deeper water.
  21. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    Agree :) By the way CV52 on Striker 7 does not...

    Agree :) By the way CV52 on Striker 7 does not pinging at the same time as well, and have no any signes of overlay and ghost lines, shadows are sharp...
  22. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    Yes, with Garmin GT51 - it behave exactly as...

    Yes, with Garmin GT51 - it behave exactly as Lowrance units with the same DI overlay, the same Null/ghost and waffler ghost lines at 455 and 800kHz , but GT52 on Striker 7sv has non of them at...
  23. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    Actually, normally there should be completely...

    Actually, normally there should be completely dark shadow on the right SI view, but on Lowrance units this is a left side reflection which came to the right side view via DI beam- double overlay...
  24. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    Humminbird and Garmin (GT52) have them at 800kHz...

    Humminbird and Garmin (GT52) have them at 800kHz only, but Lowrance always have them at both 800kHz and 455kHz
    http://www.bbcboards.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=291775&stc=1...
  25. Thread: CV52 vs GT52

    by vik
    Replies
    287
    Views
    29,223

    Thank you for info :) I did not know that pining...

    Thank you for info :) I did not know that pining timing can be adjusted by users, may be this is why on some Gt52 units waffle effect is almost always seen, but on others units it is not seen even at...
Results 1 to 25 of 202
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4